Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tigercap

LOL

sorry dude Trammell was not better than Ripken. NO way...

Ripken was just as loyal, hit more homers and not only fielded the position well, he revolutionized the position.....


57 posted on 01/04/2005 12:30:55 PM PST by MikefromOhio (Out of Baghdad!!!! But still boycotting boycotts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: MikeinIraq
Ripken's problem was two-fold:

1. His pursuit of Gehrig's record drove him to play every single game for years -- which I believe hurt his overall numbers.

2. Ripken only "revolutionized" the shortstop position in that he proved that a big man could play there. He wasn't a great fielder by any stretch . . . in fact, I've always said he would have been remembered as a better player if he had been a third baseman from the beginning.

69 posted on 01/04/2005 12:41:13 PM PST by Alberta's Child (If whiskey was his mistress, his true love was the West . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson