Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boggs, Sandberg Elected to Baseball Hall of Fame
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=545&ncid=755&e=1&u=/ap/20050104/ap_on_sp_ba_ne/bbo_hall_of_fame ^ | Tue, Jan 04, 2005 | RONALD BLUM, AP Sports Writer

Posted on 01/04/2005 11:42:36 AM PST by IndyTiger

Wade Boggs was overwhelmingly elected to the Hall of Fame in his first year of eligibility Tuesday, and Ryne Sandberg made it with just six votes to spare on his third try.

Boggs, a five-time American League batting champion for the Boston Red Sox (news), was selected by 474 of the record 516 voters who are 10-year members of the Baseball Writers' Association of America.

The 91.86 percent of ballots he received was the 19th-highest percentage in Hall history, and he became the 41st player elected on his first chance.

Sandberg, the 1984 National League MVP for the Chicago Cubs (news), was picked by 393 voters. He appeared on 76.2 percent of ballots, just above the 75 percent cutoff (387). Sandberg received 49.2 percent of votes in 2003 and got 61.1 percent last year, falling 71 votes short.

Results of voting by the Veterans Committee will be released March 2. Gil Hodges, Tony Oliva and Ron Santo were among the 25 candidates on that ballot.

(Excerpt) Read more at story.news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; US: Illinois; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: baseball; boggs; boston; chicago; cubs; hof; mlb; redsox; sandberg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-199 last
To: Alberta's Child

I completely agree with you about Ron Guidry. I wish he would get more HOF consideration, if not actual enshrinement.


181 posted on 01/04/2005 8:11:30 PM PST by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

I saw Rickey play last year. Had to go to Newark to do it, though.


182 posted on 01/04/2005 8:14:19 PM PST by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hondo1952
Buckner is probably the best player that will never get into the HOF. He will only be remembered for one thing. No justice for Bill.

No. Vada Pinson, Jim Rice, Tony Oliva, Gil Hodges, and even Jose Canseco were all better players. There's talk that this year is the year for Oliva and Hodges through the Vet's Committee. Hope so.

183 posted on 01/04/2005 8:14:24 PM PST by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: GreatOne

I always forget about Hodges and Pinson. I agree on those two but I'm just not sure about Canseco. In his prime he was great, no doubt about that, but he became a cartoon character his last few years and I think that will spoil his getting in. He might make it with the veterans committee. It's hard to believe Hodges still isn't in. I wonder who he made mad?


184 posted on 01/04/2005 8:17:27 PM PST by Hondo1952 (Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Hondo1952
And I forgot Steve Garvey and Don Mattingly.

Is Garvey's character issues that much of a problem for him? When he was playing, there was very little doubt that he'd be a sure-fire HOF'er. Really surprised he's not at least garnering stronger consideration.

185 posted on 01/04/2005 8:17:48 PM PST by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: GreatOne
There are some statistical sources like Bill James that will break players down for comparison purposes by posting their career numbers in the form of a "162-game average."

In Rose's case, his average season was as follows:

639 at-bats
98 runs
194 hits
34 doubles
6 triples
7 home runs
60 RBIs
9 stolen bases (in 16 attempts)
71 walks
52 strikeouts
.303 batting average

Some of these numbers are good, but overall I'd say most people would be surprised to see his career numbers in this context. The 71 walks, 52 strikeouts and 9 stolen bases are particularly disappointing -- when you consider that he was a singles hitter who batted #1 or #2 in the lineup for most of his career.

A local radio host in New York summed it up very well last year when a caller asked why he considered Rose so overrated. The host replied that in his 23-year career, there was never a time when Rose was even the best player on his own team, let alone compared to the all-time greats.

186 posted on 01/04/2005 8:20:26 PM PST by Alberta's Child (If whiskey was his mistress, his true love was the West . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: GreatOne

But when Garvey was playing he was Mr Baseball. The All American boy that could do no wrong. His problems surfaced after he retired didn't they? I know he left a string of babies in National League cities.

Mattingly should be in. He had the misfortune of playing for those bad Yankee teams. If he had made a couple of series he would be in already. The Yankees have so many in already I think he kind of gets lost in the shuffle.


187 posted on 01/04/2005 8:21:17 PM PST by Hondo1952 (Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

I have always been astounded that Jim Rice is not in the HOF. Man was an 8-time All-Star, finished in the top 5 in MVP voting 6 times, 200 hits 4 times, and had 100+ R.B.I.'s 8 times. Should be in.


188 posted on 01/04/2005 8:25:23 PM PST by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Ozzie grabbed a ball with his bare right hand?


189 posted on 01/04/2005 8:25:55 PM PST by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I'm a regular at Baseball-Reference.com, so I'm aware of the 162-game average (why I'm a huge Jim Rice supporter). But even in Rose's case, how many players average 600 at-bats? How many come close to 98 runs? 194 hits? 34 doubles? Not many who aren't HOF'ers.

If the argument is over whether Rose is one of the top 25 players ever, I'd buy into that he's not. But he is a HOF'er (based upon his numbers). And whether he was the best on his own team when he played with Bench (arguably the best catcher of all time), Morgan, Foster, Schmidt (arguably the best 3B of all time), Carlton (arguably the best LP of all time), that's not really fair.

190 posted on 01/04/2005 8:30:06 PM PST by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Tymesup

Are you being sarcastic? Perhaps the greatest fielding play of all time, right next to Mays' catch.


191 posted on 01/04/2005 8:30:58 PM PST by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: IndyTiger

I wonder if Wade will invite Margo Adams, for old times sake?


192 posted on 01/04/2005 8:31:07 PM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreatOne
Rice really tailed off badly and quickly after age 33. But his first 12 seasons were outstanding. If he could have kept it up another three, he would be a lock.

Also, Rice was not much of a defensive outfielder or baserunner--in contrast to, say, Andre Dawson who was excellent at both. They are the top two outfielders currently on the ballot. Neither may make it, but I wouldn't squawk too much if they both did.

193 posted on 01/04/2005 8:32:16 PM PST by Charles Henrickson (I'm exactly one day older than Jim Rice, btw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson
Carew couldn't carry Ryno's glove. And he was a spray singles hitter/bunter with no power. Make no mistake, Carew is Hall-worthy, but Sandberg was better overall.

No one could carry Sandberg's glove, but Carew was pretty damn close based upon fielding percentage (.985/.989), given the fact that Carew had nearly 7000 more fielding chances in his career than Sandberg (17,479/10,660 or 7.3 CPG/5.0 CPG), which suggests that Carew had greater range than Sandberg and therefore, more fielding oppurtunities. Pretty impressive for a guy who played most of his games on artifical turf where the ball moves much faster.

As far as hitting, Carew was a lead-off hitter. Lead-off hitters are supposed to get on base, and that he did with a vengence and a batting average 43 points higher than Sandberg. And despite being a lead-off "singles hitter/bunter with no power" Carew drove in nearly as many runs as Sandberg (1015/1061), hit 42 more doubles than Sandberg (445/403), smacked 36 more triples than Sandberg (112/76), had an OBP 49 points higher than Sandberg (.393/.344), and had a slugging percentage only .023 less than Sandberg (.429/.442).

194 posted on 01/05/2005 4:28:54 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Carew had nearly 7000 more fielding chances in his career than Sandberg . . . , which suggests that Carew had greater range than Sandberg. . . .

No, it suggests that Carew was so weak defensively at second that they moved him to first, where he then had more fielding chances than at second. Carew actually played more games at 1b than at 2b.

195 posted on 01/05/2005 5:16:36 AM PST by Charles Henrickson (Baseball fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
"The real shock will be when the first guy with 500 home runs is snubbed."

You mean Fred (Crime Dog) McGriff?

Hershiser and Gooden? The former...Doubtful. The latter...No way.

196 posted on 01/05/2005 7:55:37 AM PST by wireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: general_re
"At his position", and my point is that that's not really saying much. He was a lightweight,

Actually, his fielding percentage was the best ever for any infield position. At least that was ESPN said last night. Want to cut him a little slack for only being 2nd on the all time Homerun list for 2nd baseman? I am bound and determined to drive you nuts if you don't. : )

197 posted on 01/05/2005 7:14:28 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779
Actually, his fielding percentage was the best ever for any infield position.

Well, yeah, I don't dispute that he was a master of the glove, I just think his offense was lacking.

I am bound and determined to drive you nuts if you don't.

Okay, okay - I give. It's not that I think he shouldn't be there, just that I think he's not quite as great as he's been made out to be. Hope that's good enough for you, 'cause that's as far as I can go for Ryno ;)

198 posted on 01/05/2005 7:22:00 PM PST by general_re (How come so many of the VKs have been here six months or less?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Okay, okay - I give. It's not that I think he shouldn't be there, just that I think he's not quite as great as he's been made out to be. Hope that's good enough for you, 'cause that's as far as I can go for Ryno ;)

Okay, that is good enough for me too. : )

I counted 5 infielders today that are in the Hall that had inferior numbers to Sandberg as far as both fielding and hitting.

199 posted on 01/06/2005 5:36:21 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-199 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson