Skip to comments.
Married, without children: Finding fulfillment with no kids
Rocky Mountain News ^
| 1/3/05
| Mark Wolf
Posted on 01/03/2005 8:31:56 AM PST by qam1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 681-693 next last
To: Aquinasfan
Message to DINKS: Please don't regale us with stories about your "babies" (dogs or cats) at coffee. Please! Message to parents: I'll be happy to listen to you regale me with stories about your human children, but in return I expect you to listen to stories about my dog.
LQ
To: Aquinasfan
Then, by the same token, we shouldn't bore them with tales of our babies either. :)
362
posted on
01/03/2005 10:56:10 AM PST
by
exnavychick
(Just my two cents, as usual.)
To: MontanaCowgirlCop
Good golly, I would hope not! :)
363
posted on
01/03/2005 10:57:26 AM PST
by
exnavychick
(Just my two cents, as usual.)
To: Hemingway's Ghost
364
posted on
01/03/2005 10:57:43 AM PST
by
Durus
To: freedumb2003
That's just it. It's their "choice" to have or have not, and no one else's concern. I don't whine to childless couples about my 3 and I don't want them bragging about being able to fly anywhere anytime because they don't have any. I could care less. If you choose to have children, you make the sacrifices and shut-up, if you choose not to, don't complain about not getting any attention or get defensive and tell me your reasons for remaining childless.
365
posted on
01/03/2005 10:58:02 AM PST
by
Ellesu
To: Rebelbase
The most "fulfilled" DINKS I know are those who pursue equestrian hobbies. Horses take the place of kids both for having something to love and at the same time having something to take your money.Am I one of those RB? We feel pretty fulfilled!
And where would I put the baby while cleaning stalls? :~D
To: cyborg
Ugh. My least favorite part. And the worst is changing a nasty diaper when you have morning sickness. Many is the time I've had to hand the chore over in a hurry so as not to make a mess of my own! LOL
367
posted on
01/03/2005 10:58:25 AM PST
by
exnavychick
(Just my two cents, as usual.)
To: hopespringseternal
Wanting only two children qualifies as well. No society can be maintained with that sort of outlook. An infinitely increasing population is a recipe for disaster. There are very real limits to water tables, arable land, and so forth. Exponential systems always crash.
To: Modernman
What harm do these folks do by choosing not to have kids?" Besides slapping God in the face (artificial contraception is like binging and purging, except this is "binging and purging" with the greatest human power, the ability to co-create children with God), the implications for society are obvious.
369
posted on
01/03/2005 10:58:54 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: qam1
It doesn't occur to anybody to celebrate a child-free woman in that way.
A new level of selfishness. Not only dont they want kids but they want to get celebrated for it. sheesh.
I'll bet a lot of these people have pets that are spoiled beyond belief...most orphaned children would be grateful with half the love received by these pets.
370
posted on
01/03/2005 10:59:39 AM PST
by
wallcrawlr
(www.bionicear.com)
To: durasell
Complete instruction manual included. Where do I get one of those? Every book I have found is full of liberal "feel-good" claptrap and is completely useless when dealing with a real child.
371
posted on
01/03/2005 11:00:24 AM PST
by
RebelBanker
(To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women!)
To: jerwin63
RE: Most give up that hope about the time the schools get hold of them.
DING! DING! DING! DING! DING!
Correctomundo! Herein lies an essential demotivator to me fathering a child!
372
posted on
01/03/2005 11:00:46 AM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: hopespringseternal
But the older I get, the more I feel my own mortality, the more I realize that time spent on myself is more of a necessity than an entitlement or priviledge. And spending too much time on myself is just vanity, a waste that neither makes me nor anyone else happy. Well said.
373
posted on
01/03/2005 11:01:27 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: HairOfTheDog
Hey, I'm not knocking it, just presenting my observation of a few of my friends. Sometimes I wish I was their horse.
374
posted on
01/03/2005 11:02:49 AM PST
by
Rebelbase
(Who is General Chat?)
To: exnavychick
375
posted on
01/03/2005 11:05:25 AM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: cyborg
Easier to care for than kids. Actually, this isn't true. My wife and I both had dogs when we were married, and didn't have any luck getting pregnant for a couple of years. So I can tell you that taking care of two dogs is more work than taking care of two children. Infants and toddlers require more care, but that only lasts for a few years. Dogs remain babies forever. 8-)
376
posted on
01/03/2005 11:06:39 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: Aquinasfan
Besides slapping God in the face (artificial contraception is like binging and purging, except this is "binging and purging" with the greatest human power, the ability to co-create children with God), If there is a God, that slap to the face is between them and Him.
the implications for society are obvious
A statistically insignificant percentage of people choosing not to have children really makes no difference to society at large. Furthermore, I would wager that DINK couples contribute more to society than they take out, financially-speaking.
In any event, the only reason we are particularly concerned with birthrates is because we have set up the social security pyramid scheme. If it wasn't for that, all we would really need is a replacement level birthrate, and we are close to that right now. We can make up the difference with (smart) immigration, if need be.
377
posted on
01/03/2005 11:07:14 AM PST
by
Modernman
(What is moral is what you feel good after. - Ernest Hemingway)
To: qam1
"Whether or not I want to have kids is not the only consideration," said Wenker. "I believe there's a problem with population, serious issues with the environment, and I believe I have to be part of the solution."
Heh heh. This Wanker guy, doesn't he live next door to the Griswolds?
378
posted on
01/03/2005 11:07:32 AM PST
by
Wage Slave
(All problems can be solved with duct tape or violence.)
To: EternalVigilance
Yeah, and babies don't crawl over and eat their puke after they do it. And they don't bark.
To: willyboyishere
380
posted on
01/03/2005 11:09:17 AM PST
by
cyborg
(http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 681-693 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson