Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Honestfreedom
I agree. The Neoconservatives are not monolithic. Even in the current Rumsfeld criticism they are publicly divided.

Are two neoconservative houses, both alike in dignity, feuding over the fate of Secretary Rumsfeld?

The conflict in question has been fought not with swords, as in Shakespeare, but with columns in the newspapers.

In the Washington Post on December 15, William Kristol, editor and founder of the Weekly Standard, raised eyebrows when he wrote that American troops "deserve a better defense secretary than the one we have."

In the New York Post on Tuesday, under the headline "Beltway Blunder: Why 'fire Rummy' crew failed," the columnist John Podhoretz responded with a spirited defense of Mr. Rumsfeld, which criticized "in-the-know" journalists who "say things in op-eds" and others who seek the defense secretary's ouster. dissention

That sort of puts the kabosh on The Neoconservatives and the point of the article about escaping blame.

92 posted on 01/03/2005 4:53:07 PM PST by dervish (Europe can go to Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: dervish

BTW--welcome to FR. I could swear we've spoken before...


95 posted on 01/03/2005 5:20:39 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson