[Doctor Stochastic]

You've stated the second law incorrectly. By your incorrect statement, snowflakes could not form.

Theories have some requirements to be considered as such. This has been explained many times. Creationism has no falsification possibility. Anything can be explained by pointing out that "That's the way Zeus did it." ID is essentiallythe same as Creationism with Wotan replacing Zeus. Likewise, Creationism (and its various other incarnations) make no predictions that can distinguish between them and any other theory.

[Lucky Dog]

You've stated the second law incorrectly. By your incorrect statement, snowflakes could not form.

You are correct in that I did not state the second law in its complete form. However, you are incorrect in other aspects. I ask you to explain how the following quote from your own cite is materially different from my statement:

There is a tendency in nature to proceed toward a state of greater molecular disorder. This one-sidedness of nature produces irreversible processes. (p. 347)

Theories have some requirements to be considered as such... falsification possibility.

Perhaps you would explain what are the falisifcation possibilities with the therory of evolution.