Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Doctor Stochastic
You've stated the second law incorrectly. By your incorrect statement, snowflakes could not form.

You are correct in that I did not state the second law in its complete form. However, you are incorrect in other aspects. I ask you to explain how the following quote from your own cite is materially different from my statement:

There is a tendency in nature to proceed toward a state of greater molecular disorder. This one-sidedness of nature produces irreversible processes. (p. 347)

Theories have some requirements to be considered as such... falsification possibility.

Perhaps you would explain what are the falisifcation possibilities with the therory of evolution.
491 posted on 01/04/2005 11:42:52 AM PST by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies ]


To: Lucky Dog
Perhaps you would explain what are the falisifcation possibilities with the therory of evolution.

This has been done many times here. Example: rabbit fossils in pre-cambrian strate. Another example: a cat giving birth to a bird would falsify evolutionary theory.

What would falsify Creationism? Just give the outlines of an experiment or observation.

496 posted on 01/04/2005 11:50:06 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson