Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fear for Profit
Tech Central ^ | 12/28/04 | Sandy Szwarc

Posted on 01/01/2005 5:06:59 PM PST by tbird5

"Government regulation is so pervasive, so intrusive upon our freedoms, that it should be carefully measured and based on rational considerations."

-- John H. Moore, former deputy director, National Science Foundation

Virtually every aspect of our lives today is restricted in some way by the government and it's hard to imagine that such intrusions are based on anything but good science and good sense. But that's not the reality at all.

The more affluent we become, the less faith we place on scientific, reasoned approaches to our decisions. Those struggling every day to feed their children and stay alive, for example, must, of necessity, make decisions about what to eat based on evaluations balancing the benefits and risks. Only the well-to-do can afford the luxury of fretting over intangible concerns or moralizing about romantic ideals. Hence, Western developed nations are increasingly abandoning science-based assessments of risks. In their place is a growing "absolute safety at all costs" perspective that's been skillfully fueled by scares and misinformation from special interests. As a result, foods and technological developments that can and are bettering our lives and can save lives, are being maligned, feared and resisted far out of proportion to their potential risks.

(Excerpt) Read more at techcentralstation.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; government; nannystate; restricted

1 posted on 01/01/2005 5:07:00 PM PST by tbird5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tbird5
>>The more affluent we become, the less faith we place on scientific, reasoned approaches to our decisions. Those struggling every day to feed their children and stay alive, for example, must, of necessity, make decisions about what to eat based on evaluations balancing the benefits and risks. <<

That's my problem, personal afflunence? Naw, can't be. Just read the entire article. Short Summary: The reality of food and health risks has nothing to do with how safe the public feels or how risks are regulated.

2 posted on 01/01/2005 6:16:12 PM PST by B4Ranch (((The lack of alcohol in my coffee forces me to see reality!)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbird5
As a result, foods and technological developments that can and are bettering our lives and can save lives, are being maligned, feared and resisted far out of proportion to their potential risks.

Food irradiation and nuclear power are two of the major recipients of the bad press. Most people have no idea how they work, so they can be manipulated by fear of the potential 'risks' into NOT wanting to have either.

3 posted on 01/01/2005 6:30:36 PM PST by SuziQ (It's the most wonderful time of the year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson