1 posted on
01/01/2005 4:44:14 PM PST by
sionnsar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: sionnsar
I still say provisional ballots = ways to defaud an election. If our found fathers believed in them, they would have put it in and practiced it early on.
To: sionnsar
I've been saying for a while now that there should be a comparrison between the number of votes cast, and the number of votes tallied. I'm glad that someone has looked into the matter.
Since Precinct 1823 counted 343 ballots, and there are only 272 voters, then it shouldn't be too difficult to track down and verify these voters. (much easier they verifying 900,000 votes)
62 posted on
01/01/2005 10:02:57 PM PST by
Cowboy Bob
(Fraud is the lifeblood of the Democratic Party)
To: sionnsar; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; goldenstategirl; ..
65 posted on
01/01/2005 10:35:49 PM PST by
narses
(Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family + Vivo Christo Rey!)
To: sionnsar
Are we to believe that King County had a 100% turnout even if we believed the canvassing board that the data lists were simply incomplete?
To: sionnsar
Something is wrong up there in Washington. I surely hope the WA GOP finds out who is perpetrating the fraud errr.....miscounts.
82 posted on
01/02/2005 4:47:11 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: sionnsar
This really helps to prove how we have to get the voting system fixed. The way it is now is too unsecure. Hopefully they will revote, any idea if they will?
84 posted on
01/02/2005 6:20:28 PM PST by
shayl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson