Posted on 01/01/2005 2:01:53 PM PST by freespirited
SPOKANE, Wash. -- A Spokane woman trying to divorce her estranged husband two years after he was jailed for beating her has been told by a judge she can't get out of the marriage while she's pregnant.
The case pits a first-year attorney who argues that state law allows any couple to divorce if neither spouse challenges it against a longtime family law judge who asserts that the rights of the unborn child in this type of case trump a woman's right to divorce.
"There's a lot of case law that says it is important in this state that children not be illegitamized," Spokane County Superior Court Judge Paul Bastine told The Spokesman-Review newspaper.
Further complicating things, Shawnna Hughes claims her husband is not the child's father.
The bottom line, says Hughes' attorney, Terri Sloyer, is that there's nothing in state law that says a mother can't get a divorce if she's pregnant.
"We don't live in 15th-century England," Sloyer said. "I am absolutely dumbfounded by it."
Hughes' husband, Carlos, was convicted in 2002 of beating her. She separated from him after the attack and filed for divorce last April. She later became pregnant by another man and is due in March.
Her husband never contested the divorce, and Court Commissioner Pro Tem Julia Pelc approved it in late October.
However, the approved divorce papers didn't note that Hughes was pregnant. Sloyer filed amended papers to correct the omission, and the next day, she spoke with Bastine by phone. Bastine said he planned to rescind the divorce and then did so following a Nov. 4 hearing.
"It's not the child's fault that mom got pregnant," Bastine said. "The answer is, you don't go around doing that when you're not divorced."
Sloyer has appealed.
"This is a very dangerous precedent to set - particularly in this case, with a woman who is a victim of domestic violence," Sloyer said.
In comments submitted to Bastine, Hughes said: "If this court vacates my divorce and requires me to stay married to a man I have no desire ever to have a relationship with and who has brought significant physical harm to me over the years, I would be emotionally devastated. If the court vacates my divorce and stays it until the birth of my child, it will prevent me from marrying the father of my child prior to her birth."
The state's Uniform Parentage Act sets the rules for who cares for children, including those not yet born in cases of divorce. A husband is presumed to be the father of any child born up to 300 days after a divorce.
The judge argued that the paternity of Hughes' child needs to be determined before a divorce is finalized.
"One of the problems here was that the child was not made party to the litigation," Bastine said. "There are statutory provisions that deal with paternity. Those are the statutes that are critical ones that determine the rights of the child."
Hughes has stated in court records that the father is her boyfriend, Chauncey Jacques, who pleaded guilty to a gang-related shooting in 1998 that blinded an elderly man.
"She has the right to divorce and be free to marry whoever she wants," Sloyer said. "It's about the choice, the fundamental right to choose."
James H. Hardisty, a professor at the University of Washington School of Law, said he had never heard of a judge rescinding a divorce because of a woman's pregnancy, but noted that a 1981 state Supreme Court gives courts the right to put divorces on hold when matters like child custody and division of property still need to be resolved.
Damn puzzling...
In any case the husband he is screwed, as are almost all males in our corrupt divorce courts.
My daughter's husband left her when she was six months pregnant for another woman. Here in Missouri, she couldn't even file for a legal separation until after the child was born.
A good commentary on this story. Let's not be quick to absolve the husband here:
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/003449.php
>>Here in Missouri, she couldn't even file for a legal separation until after the child was born.>>
Good. The kid needs a father on his birtch certificate.
if she is divorced they can't stick him for child support, even though it is someone elses child.
They can't stick him for child support? Last I saw, the courts usually stuck the husbands with child support, even when it was proven that he wasn't the father...
Can't the judge order a DNA test? If the child is not the father's, illegitimacy is not at issue. And it hasn't been a stigma for a long time now.
yeah but I am thinking if they get divorced, then he proves it is not his child, why could they go after him?
So what? The man's in jail. How much child support is going to be able to pay in jail?
"Much of claimed domestic violence is bogus...."
It seems a jury of his peers saw it otherwise.
I lived in Washington back in the early 90's. My wife and I filed for divorce in Tacoma. She was pregnant at the time. The judge refused to hear the case until paternity was established. The funny part is that after a year or so, we patched up our differences and we're still married today. Only now, we're HAPPILY married instead of just sharing the same home. I believe God put his hand on us that day.
Why would the judge pass up a perfectly good opportunity to enslave someone?
So she can get a divorce by going any place else, right? Go to Reno for instance.
"Seems incredibly strange that a judge would want to compel any person to remain with a spouse who abused them and was jailed for the crime."
His punishment will be being named the father in all legal documents even though all parties agree he isn't. This will cost him thousands for the next 18-21 years!
"If the child is from the paramour, then he can be compelled to provide support."
And you are 1000% wrong.
sounds like double jeopardy to me. I believe its crazy a judge wants a woman to stay married to a man who physically abuses her. Isn't that putting the child at risk?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.