Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: coloradan

That is NOT what it says here.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1311970/posts?page=13#13

Original model was charted at 8.0

Confirmed with Australia and Japan.


117 posted on 01/01/2005 8:39:36 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: Calpernia
The differing magnitude estimates may have come other sources than the one you cited, however, the central point of my post is confirmed by your cite: at 2:59 PM HST the quake occurred. (t=0) At 3:07 (t+8 mins) they first became aware of the quake at all. At this time, islands nearest the epicenter have already been struck by the tsunami. 3:14 PM (t+14 mins) they issued a bulletin stating no threat to pacific nations. By this time, mainland Sumatra was already being hit. At 4:04 PM (t+1 hr 5 min) they revised quake from 8.0 to 8.5. By this time, Sumatra was already destroyed. At approximately 5:30 p.m. (t+2hr 31 min) Internet newswire reports of casualties in Sri Lanka provided PTWC with the first indications of the existence of a destructive tsunami.

As I posted, they did not have advance warning of the tsunami, and incidentally the first indications of the destruction came from across the Indian ocean.

118 posted on 01/01/2005 11:56:18 AM PST by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: Calpernia

You are right however that American authorities thought the quake was in the 8s, not the 7s, when the waves struck.


119 posted on 01/01/2005 11:58:18 AM PST by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson