If your theory, (*those of us who oppose Bushs immigration proposal are no more than rigidly holding onto the "status quo"*) held any credibility, then why are we the ones demanding "change?" "Status quo" has allowed millions of lawbreakers to enter this country and wreck havoc for several decades. How is it that a "new law" will fix "status quo"??? For that matter, is it not "status quo" that is determining which "laws" are inforced or not? Is it not the duty of our government to protect her citizens; not to protect illegal invaders?
President Bush's plan registers illegals and their employers.
How do you explain these "illegals" nervously exiting by the thousands into Canada? Canada Cracks Down on Asylum Seekers
Please note, they are not being called "illegals" anymore... they are now "refugees." SOURCE
Are you demanding change, or are you simply demanding that "existing laws be enforced?"