Posted on 12/30/2004 6:49:56 PM PST by topher
Data on this webpage will change over time.
This is a sliding window, so we will loose the data before the time of the earthquake if not posted.
Summary of quakes in 9.0 area:
12-30-04 -> five 5+ earthquakes and one 4.9 earthquake
12-29-04 -> two 6+ earthquakes and three 5+ earthquakes
12-28-04 -> twelve 5+ earthquakes and three 4+ earthquakes
12-27-04 -> two 6+, twenty 5+, nine 4+ earthquakes
12-26-04 -> one 9.0, one 7.1, six 6+, and twenty-five 5+ earthquakes
12-25-04 -> one 4.7 in Halmahera, Indonesia
12-24-04 -> one 4.5 in Java, Indonesia
Note that there is a revision here -- the 7.1 in the quake area on December 26, 2004 was once listed as 7.5 quake.
Doesn't the world experience a ton of seismic activity during the course of a day? And isn't most of it not even noticeable, even 4 and 5.0?
Really big quakes have big aftershocks.
Not to ask a dumb question, but can the aftershocks (in the Sumatra area) cause subsequent tsunami(s)?
Any that would be damaging would be pretty unlikely.
But the Indonesia/India [Islands] are dominating the list.
This is the data USGS is presenting, not me.
Just look at Dec 24 and Dec 25, and then look at Dec 30 in the list -- Indonesia/India barely register on the 24th and 25th, but they dominate on the Dec 30 in number and size.
There are still a number of major aftershocks [6+ and 5+ magnitude quakes daily in the area of the 9.0].
Agreed. One point of my posting seems to show it to start to taper off -- which I hope it continues to do.
Speculation is not my goal -- just crunching data. On Dec 23 there was a major earthquake event that is now already forgotten.
At that time, people were concerned about the poor penquins losing some ice falling into the ocean.
That was because of an 8.1 in the New Zealand area.
Now, for some reason, people are not worried about the penguins in that area...
It almost looks like the two Indonesian quakes on the 24th and 25th were prequakes. But they could also be a shift in other faults that caused the pressure to cause that 9.0.
I wonder if the Saint Helens action resulted from any of this ring of fire action.
I like to look at the map of North West (US) earthquakes on a daily basis. It's almost like hunting, trying to get a red one (within two hours). I find the history patterns (two weeks)interesting. Couple years ago I saw a different pattern that caught my eye. Ended up with that big one in puget sound. I have often wondered if anyone at the universities is following these histories and recognizing any patterns.
I am just posting the earthquake activity before and after. They are just numbers.
If someone in research wants the data, it is there for them. For someone who is untrained, like myself, I will not even speculate.
I actually believe the exact opposite -- those quakes were too small. If our government believed that, then people in California would daily think there might be the big one.
There were very small earthquakes. And they were not as close [by distance] as these aftershocks to the big one.
You can not say there will be a 9.0 earthquake because of a 4.x and a 4.y earthquake on two different days.
Krakatoa in 1883 was much more predictable because it was a volcano, and there were observations of significant activity.
The major quakes for 2004 can be found at:
Significant Earthquakes in 2004
From this site, you will that there was a fairly big earthquake in Indonesia on November 11 -- but that is not out of the ordinary. That is why the small quakes would not be an indicator -- necessarily.
November 11 -- Kepulauan Alor, Indonesia -- 7.5M
THANKS MUCH.
Have long wanted to print out my listing of such in my email program but can't figure out how to print the listing of emails by subject line etc. such as you've done.
http://aslwww.cr.usgs.gov/Seismic_Data/heli2.shtml
Todays incoming is very quiet compared to the last weeks data.
All of these windows were almost black a week ago!
They've determined the cause on DU: oil companies drilling and secret nuclear tests that avoid seismic detection.
I kid you not.
Wasn't there something about a meteorite? And Antarctica, too? Something is going on. I do, however, wonder about the other side of the Pacific, a counterbalance. I was thinking Alaska, but maybe this is a Southern Hemisphere event.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.