Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Worldwide Earthquake Activity in the Last Seven Days -- Just Prior to 9.0 and until Dec 30
USGS Earthquake Program ^ | Dec 30, 2004

Posted on 12/30/2004 6:49:56 PM PST by topher

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
The point of this is to take a snapshot of activity from 12-24-04 to 12-30-04. It shows the number of quakes in this area and worldwide activity. The activity in the rest of the world pales by comparison even today. Below are the quake list with [number of quakes] followed by [magnitude].

Data on this webpage will change over time.

This is a sliding window, so we will loose the data before the time of the earthquake if not posted.

Summary of quakes in 9.0 area:

12-30-04 -> five 5+ earthquakes and one 4.9 earthquake

12-29-04 -> two 6+ earthquakes and three 5+ earthquakes

12-28-04 -> twelve 5+ earthquakes and three 4+ earthquakes

12-27-04 -> two 6+, twenty 5+, nine 4+ earthquakes

12-26-04 -> one 9.0, one 7.1, six 6+, and twenty-five 5+ earthquakes

12-25-04 -> one 4.7 in Halmahera, Indonesia

12-24-04 -> one 4.5 in Java, Indonesia

Note that there is a revision here -- the 7.1 in the quake area on December 26, 2004 was once listed as 7.5 quake.

1 posted on 12/30/2004 6:49:57 PM PST by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: topher

Doesn't the world experience a ton of seismic activity during the course of a day? And isn't most of it not even noticeable, even 4 and 5.0?


2 posted on 12/30/2004 6:53:27 PM PST by Barte45 (Conservative Christian @ Heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Really big quakes have big aftershocks.


3 posted on 12/30/2004 6:56:29 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Not to ask a dumb question, but can the aftershocks (in the Sumatra area) cause subsequent tsunami(s)?


4 posted on 12/30/2004 6:58:30 PM PST by PennsylvaniaMom (FreeMartha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PennsylvaniaMom
Not to ask a dumb question, but can the aftershocks (in the Sumatra area) cause subsequent tsunami(s)?

Any that would be damaging would be pretty unlikely.

5 posted on 12/30/2004 6:59:04 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Barte45
If you look at what USGS is posting, they are posting 3+ magnitude quakes in California during this period.

But the Indonesia/India [Islands] are dominating the list.

This is the data USGS is presenting, not me.

Just look at Dec 24 and Dec 25, and then look at Dec 30 in the list -- Indonesia/India barely register on the 24th and 25th, but they dominate on the Dec 30 in number and size.

There are still a number of major aftershocks [6+ and 5+ magnitude quakes daily in the area of the 9.0].

6 posted on 12/30/2004 7:01:17 PM PST by topher (God bless & Protect our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
Really big quakes have big aftershocks.

Agreed. One point of my posting seems to show it to start to taper off -- which I hope it continues to do.

7 posted on 12/30/2004 7:02:46 PM PST by topher (God bless & Protect our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: topher
I wonder if we'll see a new volcano or island chain formed in that region?
8 posted on 12/30/2004 7:05:21 PM PST by b4its2late (If God had intended us to drink beer, He would have given us stomachs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher
I read a newspaper article today from Russia that said a Russian seismologist said the next big earthquake would be in the South American region according to his calculations.

Interesting post seeing all the activity before and after.

http://www.hwn.org/home/atlantic.html
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsww

and if your interested in volcano activity:

http://volcano.und.nodak.edu/vwdocs/current_volcs/current.html
9 posted on 12/30/2004 7:07:41 PM PST by Ginifer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
I wonder if we'll see a new volcano or island chain formed in that region?

Speculation is not my goal -- just crunching data. On Dec 23 there was a major earthquake event that is now already forgotten.

At that time, people were concerned about the poor penquins losing some ice falling into the ocean.

That was because of an 8.1 in the New Zealand area.

Now, for some reason, people are not worried about the penguins in that area...

10 posted on 12/30/2004 7:09:32 PM PST by topher (God bless & Protect our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: topher

It almost looks like the two Indonesian quakes on the 24th and 25th were prequakes. But they could also be a shift in other faults that caused the pressure to cause that 9.0.


11 posted on 12/30/2004 7:09:54 PM PST by notpoliticallycorewrecked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

I wonder if the Saint Helens action resulted from any of this ring of fire action.


12 posted on 12/30/2004 7:11:48 PM PST by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

I like to look at the map of North West (US) earthquakes on a daily basis. It's almost like hunting, trying to get a red one (within two hours). I find the history patterns (two weeks)interesting. Couple years ago I saw a different pattern that caught my eye. Ended up with that big one in puget sound. I have often wondered if anyone at the universities is following these histories and recognizing any patterns.


13 posted on 12/30/2004 7:13:40 PM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ginifer
Interesting post seeing all the activity before and after.

I am just posting the earthquake activity before and after. They are just numbers.

If someone in research wants the data, it is there for them. For someone who is untrained, like myself, I will not even speculate.

14 posted on 12/30/2004 7:15:24 PM PST by topher (God bless & Protect our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
It almost looks like the two Indonesian quakes on the 24th and 25th were prequakes. But they could also be a shift in other faults that caused the pressure to cause that 9.0.

I actually believe the exact opposite -- those quakes were too small. If our government believed that, then people in California would daily think there might be the big one.

There were very small earthquakes. And they were not as close [by distance] as these aftershocks to the big one.

You can not say there will be a 9.0 earthquake because of a 4.x and a 4.y earthquake on two different days.

Krakatoa in 1883 was much more predictable because it was a volcano, and there were observations of significant activity.

15 posted on 12/30/2004 7:21:09 PM PST by topher (God bless & Protect our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
It almost looks like the two Indonesian quakes on the 24th and 25th were prequakes. But they could also be a shift in other faults that caused the pressure to cause that 9.0.

The major quakes for 2004 can be found at:

Significant Earthquakes in 2004

From this site, you will that there was a fairly big earthquake in Indonesia on November 11 -- but that is not out of the ordinary. That is why the small quakes would not be an indicator -- necessarily.

November 11 -- Kepulauan Alor, Indonesia -- 7.5M

16 posted on 12/30/2004 7:32:09 PM PST by topher (God bless & Protect our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: topher

THANKS MUCH.

Have long wanted to print out my listing of such in my email program but can't figure out how to print the listing of emails by subject line etc. such as you've done.


17 posted on 12/30/2004 7:59:48 PM PST by Quix (HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. I TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

http://aslwww.cr.usgs.gov/Seismic_Data/heli2.shtml
Todays incoming is very quiet compared to the last weeks data.
All of these windows were almost black a week ago!


18 posted on 12/30/2004 8:04:11 PM PST by Tigen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

They've determined the cause on DU: oil companies drilling and secret nuclear tests that avoid seismic detection.

I kid you not.


19 posted on 12/30/2004 8:30:36 PM PST by Elvis van Foster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Wasn't there something about a meteorite? And Antarctica, too? Something is going on. I do, however, wonder about the other side of the Pacific, a counterbalance. I was thinking Alaska, but maybe this is a Southern Hemisphere event.


20 posted on 12/30/2004 9:02:08 PM PST by combat_boots (Dug in and not budging an inch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson