Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BradyLS
Brady, unfortunately that link goes to commentary written after the fact. 20/20 hindsight or saying "they should have known" doesn't make it so.

Prior to the catastrophic tsunami, the Indian Ocean was not considered at high risk for an earthquake generated tsunami.

333 posted on 12/31/2004 4:21:51 AM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: bd476
Prior to the catastrophic tsunami, the Indian Ocean was not considered at high risk for an earthquake generated tsunami.

I certainly agree that the risk was low. Still, low risk is not no risk.

I don't think it was too much to expect that the Indian Ocean nations would have augmented their weather tracking and early warning systems for monsoons and other tropical storms that hit their coasts with a similar warning system for a seismic event.

Perhaps it would not have changed the result even if they had. But it frosts me that we in the United States plan for it and other nations, for whatever reason, are not expected to.

334 posted on 12/31/2004 5:07:27 AM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson