Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bd476
Prior to the catastrophic tsunami, the Indian Ocean was not considered at high risk for an earthquake generated tsunami.

I certainly agree that the risk was low. Still, low risk is not no risk.

I don't think it was too much to expect that the Indian Ocean nations would have augmented their weather tracking and early warning systems for monsoons and other tropical storms that hit their coasts with a similar warning system for a seismic event.

Perhaps it would not have changed the result even if they had. But it frosts me that we in the United States plan for it and other nations, for whatever reason, are not expected to.

334 posted on 12/31/2004 5:07:27 AM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]


To: BradyLS
Two of our States, Alaska and Hawaii had terrible catastrophic tsunamis in one century. The USA West Coast is part of the "Ring of Fire" zone.

Oregon and Washington are at high risk for a catastrophic local tsunami at some point in the hopefully distant future.

The USA has to have the tide gauges on buoys for tsunami detection along our coast.

335 posted on 12/31/2004 5:14:10 AM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson