Skip to comments.
Jan Egeland biography (pays no income tax)
UN ^
| Dec. 30, 2004
| JohnCliftn
Posted on 12/29/2004 9:50:28 PM PST by JohnCliftn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: elli1
Who are the employees of the United Nations giving political money to?
Let's look...
Who'da thunk?
21
posted on
12/29/2004 10:30:03 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: JohnCliftn
Does he pay taxes in Sweden where income tax is as follows {I have no doubt that the UN does
NOT pay the employer tax or the pension fee or any of the other taxes. I'll also bet that he intends to collect the Swedish pension}:
"Sweden has a taxation system that combines a direct tax (paid by the employee) with an indirect tax (paid by the employer). In practice, the employer provides the state with both means of taxation but the employee only sees the direct tax on his declaration form. Below is a compilation of the taxes that compose the final income tax (2003):
Tax on "gross" income "from the employer": 32,82% (indirect, fixed)
Pension "fee" on "gross" income: 6.95% (indirect, fixed)
"State tax" on, "gross" income less pension tax and a "base deduction": ~32% (direct, varies by state)
"Federal tax" on, "gross" income less pension tax and a "base deduction": 0%, 20% or 25% (direct, progressive)
[edit]
Example
Income: 180,000 kronor ($25,000)
Tax: 121,634 (68% of income)
"Employer tax": 59,076
Pension "fee": 12,510
State tax: 50,048
Income: 450,000 kronor ($64,285) (eligible for "federal" income tax of 25%)
Tax: 412,665 (92% of income)
"Employer tax": 147,690
Pension "fee": 31,275
State tax: 131,200
Federal tax: 102,500 "
Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax
22
posted on
12/29/2004 10:31:58 PM PST
by
airedale
( XZ)
To: FreedomCalls
Man, they love sKerry and the democrats, don't they. Who'd a thunk it.
23
posted on
12/29/2004 10:38:12 PM PST
by
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
To: JohnCliftn
You may have picked up a link for a lecturer/researcher; someone who has already received a degree. A Fulbright Scholar is usually in pursuit of a degree and doesn't get anywhere near that amount of money. Also, both governments support the program. It's not just the US. I think the info you want is here: http://www.fulbright.no/?module=Articles;action=Article.publicShow;ID=32
My friend is a Fulbright Scholar from Norway. She would be shocked to find out she is getting $5000 a month.
My understanding is she got about $10-12,000 her first year and that was it. After that, she only has her stipend to live on, which is the same $1400 or so that we all made as doctoral students before passing our comprehensive exams.
She has the title of Fulbright Scholar, which is trotted out at school functions and a crappy insurance coverage from them, worse than the university student insurance. Unless she gets something new on a Christmas trip home to Norway, she's been wearing the same clothes since we got here in 2001.
I have some additional scholarship income and often give my friend food, school supplies and other odds and ends, as $1400 doesn't go far in Seattle, rents being what they are.
I'm not supporting Egeland. I just didn't want people to have the wrong idea about the program. The money allowed her to get out of Norway with a little money to get an apartment, etc. over here. It was hardly a windfall for a 5 year program.
To: ijcr
You are better at figuring this stuff than I am, but all your numbers need to be increased a bit. It is strange, but your link goes to the 2002 sheet, mine to the 2003 spreadsheet. Mine was reached by going
here and clicking on
Click Here under "THE PROFESSIONAL AND HIGHER CATEGORIES".
25
posted on
12/29/2004 11:45:44 PM PST
by
JohnCliftn
(UN logic = Pay for a job not done = Pay a thief not to steal.)
To: JohnCliftn
If he has children the UN also pays the full tuition for them to attend any University in the world..tax fee of course.
26
posted on
12/30/2004 12:01:43 AM PST
by
Oldexpat
To: NautiNurse; ken5050; Mo1
27
posted on
12/30/2004 12:03:44 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: ijcr
This totals out at US $349,120 p.a..And no taxes?
BTW, nice work.
28
posted on
12/30/2004 12:04:37 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: Oldexpat
Just glancing at him, I don't think he's a breeder.
29
posted on
12/30/2004 12:05:04 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: JohnCliftn
Can someone please ping . . .
The Washington Times
The New York Post
The Boston Herald
FOX News
Rush
etc.
To: FreedomCalls
Who are the employees of the United Nations giving political money to? Let's look... That's too funny!
31
posted on
12/30/2004 12:06:41 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
And this jackal had the nerve to say we want to be taxed more to pay his bleeping bleeping salary????
32
posted on
12/30/2004 12:06:42 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Should be called Oil for Fraud and not Oil for Food)
To: leadpenny
Never mind. I just sent it to the White House.
33
posted on
12/30/2004 12:07:05 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Nothing like starting at the top.
BTW, you're in great form this morning, or is it still evening for you?
To: FreedomCalls
Does the UN reimburse them for that too??
35
posted on
12/30/2004 12:09:38 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Should be called Oil for Fraud and not Oil for Food)
To: leadpenny
Evening for me, morning for you, I'm sure. Gosh, is it 3 a.m.?????
I am in a good mood tonight. Nothing I love more than seeing a man like this jerk exposed!
36
posted on
12/30/2004 12:09:56 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
As the fellow from the Guardian Angels (I don't want to attempt spelling) sitting in for Hannity called him, "The Squarehead!"
To: libertyman
The 16th amendment was NEVER ratified. It was declared ratified by executive fiat. It has no legal basis except the defacto status we have given it by our compliance.
(Name withheld to protect the non-compliant!)
38
posted on
12/30/2004 12:13:30 AM PST
by
shibumi
("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." - John Galt)
To: leadpenny
Curtis called him that? Way cool.
39
posted on
12/30/2004 12:16:29 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: JohnCliftn
Oh, if they think the heat they got from the "Oil for Food" scandal was bad, when this is hits, it's going to go from bake to full Boil.
What this article means in a nutshell that since the U.S. taxpayers pay for 20% to 25% of the UN's dues that we U.S. taxpayers are paying these elitists' TAXES.
And these elitists still have the gall to bad mouth us.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson