Skip to comments.
Briton surfed his way to Maldives safety
Some obscure news website ^
| 27/12/2004
| Staff
Posted on 12/29/2004 7:48:51 AM PST by Rebelbase
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
There were probably more of them out there that just hung onto their boards and rode it out that way.
1
posted on
12/29/2004 7:48:52 AM PST
by
Rebelbase
To: Rebelbase
said guests at Lohifushi huddled around the bar area, which was the only major part of the island that stayed consistently above waterThere's a joke in there somewhere.
2
posted on
12/29/2004 7:51:30 AM PST
by
mtbopfuyn
To: mtbopfuyn
The bar stayed high and dry...
To: Rebelbase
Tourists described three-feet-high walls of water sweeping across their resort islands and into their bedrooms...
I don't know about you, but 3 foot waves have always terrified me! ;-D
4
posted on
12/29/2004 7:57:59 AM PST
by
luv2ski
To: luv2ski
Three feet of water covering the highest ground on a little island should terrify you ...
5
posted on
12/29/2004 8:00:09 AM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: luv2ski
3' waves in my bedroom would get my attention.
6
posted on
12/29/2004 8:01:35 AM PST
by
Rebelbase
(Who is General Chat?)
To: Rebelbase
Any chance that Osama bin Laden got washed out to sea?
7
posted on
12/29/2004 8:10:57 AM PST
by
First_Salute
(May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
To: Rebelbase
I remember this story from an episode of Gilligan's Island.
The surfer who rode the tsunami into their lagoon was going to lead to their rescue!
I don't remember the exact details, but I believe the plan fell apart based on some stupid action by Gilligan.
8
posted on
12/29/2004 9:04:59 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Rebelbase
He said there was a six-feet-high surge in the waves and he was dragged along the edge of a powerful current, though he managed to stay out of the worst of it. Finally he reached an area where he could stand and fought his way to shore.
Getting dragged along is surfing? Call me crazy, or picky but there's nothing in this story that details him surfing the tsunami. I read this story based on what the title said and yet nothing in it indicates surfing.
Maybe the folks who make up titles should actually read the article first.
9
posted on
12/29/2004 9:17:46 AM PST
by
BigWaveBetty
(Merry Christmas!)
To: luv2ski
I don't know about you, but 3 foot waves have always terrified me!Being caught up in three foot waves full of jagged churning pieces of debris would terrify me.
10
posted on
12/29/2004 9:36:17 AM PST
by
fso301
To: fso301
Being caught up in three foot waves full of jagged churning pieces of debris would terrify me..
I don't disagree but I am fairly sure that the original article has a typo. What I have read said that the wave was a wall of water 30 feet high, not 3 (hence my sarcasm).
11
posted on
12/29/2004 9:40:12 AM PST
by
luv2ski
To: dead
I believe the plan fell apart based on some stupid action by Gilligan.
Damn that Gilligan...everytime they're close to being rescued, he screws something up.
12
posted on
12/29/2004 9:53:15 AM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(Oh yeah - and F the french too!)
To: dead
To: luv2ski
It's not the height of the wave, it's the speed. I guarantee a three-foot wave going 30-40 MPH would knock you down. Then you better pray it doesn't smash you into anything, or you get impaled by the mini-torpedoes of debris in the water.
14
posted on
12/29/2004 9:58:05 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
To: eyedigress
I always think of that episode of Gilligan when the subject of tsunamis comes up
15
posted on
12/29/2004 9:58:51 AM PST
by
virgil
To: Rebelbase
Gimme a break. This is a bigger crock than the story of the WTC survivor who "surfed" the crumbling structure down to minor injuries.
To: Rebelbase
17
posted on
12/29/2004 10:44:59 AM PST
by
6323cd
("It is prohibited to make use of such emotional signs in a cellphone!")
To: luv2ski
"I don't disagree but I am fairly sure that the original article has a typo. What I have read said that the wave was a wall of water 30 feet high, not 3 (hence my sarcasm)."
No. 30 feet would have killed virtually everyone in the Maldives. They are only a few feet above sea level. Since only about 50 people were killed and only 4 of 80 resorts were flooded, 3' high waves is probably correct. It is the strong currents that kill people.
18
posted on
12/29/2004 10:51:14 AM PST
by
monday
To: luv2ski
I don't know about you, but 3 foot waves have always terrified me! ;-DWalk across a fast flowing three foot deep river and report back to us.
19
posted on
12/29/2004 11:01:01 AM PST
by
mikegi
To: Rebelbase
20
posted on
12/29/2004 11:06:06 AM PST
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson