Posted on 12/28/2004 11:01:55 AM PST by JeffersonRepublic.com
Israel has cancelled plans to send a 150-person rescue mission to Sri Lanka after the devastated island objected to the military composition of the team.
The delegation - including 60 soldiers - had been due to set off on Tuesday to help after Sunday's tsunami disaster.
Instead, a smaller team will escort a convoy carrying emergency supplies, Israeli officials said.
Sri Lanka restored diplomatic ties with Israel in 2000, despite objections from the island's Muslim minority.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...
We shouldn't give one red cent to the Sri Lankans - you want to spurn Israelis offer for help, you must not need ours either.
I wonder what message God meant to send to Florida this summer. Or New York a few years ago. Or the people at that tower in Siloam two thousand years ago.
I'm not at all averse to the idea that God has messages to send in today's world, but with Yasser Arafat living to a fairly comfortable old age while thousands of young children die along the Indian Ocean, I am skeptical that lifespan or means of death necessarily means anything like that.
GOD acts in very mysterious ways, and even though we might see all the death especially children as tragic there death might have another meaning for GOD. We fear what we don't know.
F them then
Sri Lanka has a never ending religious war.
I don't think religious tolerance is on the menu.
"Well, I'll just tear up the check I was gonna sent to the relief fund."
Good point. I'm willing to bet that all countries hit by this disaster will reject Israeli help.
I wonder if they will reject our help?
Or just grab it , ask for more and then criticize us for not giving more and doing it quicker.
It seems that way, doesn't it?
Now, I don't have any sympathy for the likely reason, but I'm surprised by the "let them suffer" reactions--if only because that seems to be the Sri Lanka government's reaction too.
So maybe there's a sharp moral distinction between "oh, no, we can't have Israeli soldiers here!" and "making a statement" against that government. I'm not one of those "moral equivalence!" people. But if both result in the withholding of aid from people in need, aid that would come from people are otherwise willing and easily able to do so, the distinction begins to vanish before my eyes. Those who are more sensitive to nuance than I am, can you please help me see again?
I agree on your points here--any obvious, overarching message would be very mysterious (and BTW, I don't mean "mysterious" in any sarcastic way) indeed.
L0L! My Brother is on the mainland and was telling me of this tremendously religion tolerant city where all religions were welcome. But he added...there was a strange vibe there. Turns out it was 40 religion inspired murders worth of weird vibe! L0L
They recommended donations to charities providing direct help and not to any that let the Sri Lankan government handle the aid.
Lets not tear up our checks like oldgeezer and instead
send them to people have been doing good christian relief work like WorldVision. Any human kindness now will be multiplied many times over and who knows it may relieve the suffering for some of those who hold no hatred towards christians.
I just put on my flameproof underwear just in case..
Sometimes the Bush Administration can really F*** things up. I'm sorry for the language, but I had never heard this tidbit before (or don't remember it), and it really gets me very angry. Not cranky---angry.
Isn't World Vision all tied up with the UN?
You don't need to tell me; it's what I've been counseling.
Dear Sri Lanka officials: shub it. (I wouldn't even send the small convoy after that)
Actually, as others have pointed out, their help was declined because we didn't need it.
We didn't know that until the 14th or 15th.
I'd like to see this thing documented one way or another.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.