Skip to comments.
Hundreds of bogus registrations found in Seattle
Sound Politics ^
| 12/27/04
| Stefan Sharkansky
Posted on 12/27/2004 8:50:24 PM PST by freespirited
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: keithtoo
Thanks. That means that the law is on our side, too bad that Lib judges dont really care about written laws. This is the best shot for the WSRP...present piles and piles of evidence and anecdote that proper procedure has been completely neglected. Hope that eventually a judge will say there are too many questions about too many votes and that the whole damn thing has to be redone.
21
posted on
12/27/2004 9:30:39 PM PST
by
MIT-Elephant
("Armed with what? Spitballs?")
To: Publius
BUMP After four years of BOTH parties doing nothing about this, I begin to wonder if either of them want to. Same with the military mail STILL requiring a postmark when none are available in Mosul... From the president on down - 4 years later the elections are the same mess. Not a very positive sign. If we want different, we'd better speak up.
22
posted on
12/27/2004 9:37:44 PM PST
by
Libertina
(God bless and protect our troops - strengthen their families , bring them home to us!)
To: freespirited
Seattle? Corruption??? Well blow me over with a feather!
Ain't nuthin' new here; Seattle's endemic corruption, and the complicity of its fawning lefty press, was written up three decades ago in "On the Take: From Petty Crooks to Presidents" by William Chambliss (flawed thesis, but good reporting).
23
posted on
12/27/2004 9:37:56 PM PST
by
sionnsar
(† trad-anglican.faithweb.com † || Iran Azadi || My governor was stolen!)
To: keithtoo
Hundreds of bogus registrations found in SeattleWhat next???
''Sun to rise in East tomorrow''?
Tape at 11. (yawn...)
The only interesting thing here is that it took the King County version of Tammany Hall fully 52 days to steal the election.
24
posted on
12/27/2004 9:38:25 PM PST
by
SAJ
To: freespirited
Nah.
The democrats claim there is no fraud, so we know there is no fraudulent registrations and no double voters in close elections.
/sarcasm.
25
posted on
12/27/2004 9:41:00 PM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: freespirited
A spokesperson for the Secretary of State's office seemed surprised to learn about the large number of mailbox and storage locker registrations. She initially suggested the explanation that these are mailing addresses. They are not. All of these voters are precincted at such addresses, and many have alternate mailing addresses, some of which are in other states and countries. other states and countries????
Is this nit wit from the Secretary of State's office that dumb??
26
posted on
12/27/2004 9:41:06 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Should be called Oil for Fraud and not Oil for Food)
To: freespirited
This is unfair disenfranchisement of Gregoire voters, who by virtue of their supreme sophistication, can transcend the bonds of death, the definition of human, and the realm of the imagination to vote for their inevitably Democratic candidate. Many Democrats also experience the grand multiple personality disorder; each personality gets one Gregorie vote.
How else can Democrats compete when Republicans actually reproduce?
27
posted on
12/27/2004 9:41:19 PM PST
by
dufekin
(Four more years! Liberals, learn: whiners are losers every time.)
To: freespirited
Throw the book at the traitorous idiots.
28
posted on
12/27/2004 9:42:35 PM PST
by
Quix
(HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. I TIM 3:5)
To: freespirited
29
posted on
12/27/2004 9:44:06 PM PST
by
Finalapproach29er
(I can no longer discern real stories from satire on this site. America is losing her common sense.)
To: keithtoo
OK I think I just found the law as it would apply to homeless people:
WAC 434-208-100 Registering to vote -- Nontraditional address. No person registering to vote, who meets all the qualifications of a registered voter in the state of Washington, shall be disqualified because of a nontraditional physical address being used as a residence address. Nontraditional addresses may include shelters, parks or other identifiable locations which the voter deems to be his/her residence. Voters using such an address will be registered and precincted based on the location provided. Voters without a traditional address will be registered at the county courthouse, city hall or other public building near the area that the voter considers his/her residence. Registering at a nontraditional address will not disqualify a voter from requesting ongoing absentee voter status provided the voter designates a valid mailing address.
In other words, they can't use a private mailbox or storage locker.
30
posted on
12/27/2004 9:47:54 PM PST
by
freespirited
(Kerry ravaged the reputation of Vietnam vets in a manner reminiscent of a creepy liar.)
To: freespirited
I bet Rossi will be the person elected here!
Regular dims tricks and fraud will make it so.
31
posted on
12/27/2004 9:49:29 PM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: freespirited
32
posted on
12/27/2004 9:53:54 PM PST
by
MissouriConservative
( Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more; you should never wish to do less. - Robert E. Lee)
To: freespirited
To: freespirited
If any of these bogus people with the bogus addresses are actually found, find out if they were paid off in crack to register illegally!
To: freespirited
The dems are too quiet about this win - to me this says: CHEAT CHEAT CHEAT
But .. why are we surprised.
35
posted on
12/27/2004 10:23:59 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Where are the dem supporters? - try the trash cans in back of the abortion clinics.)
To: Libertina
BUMP After four years of BOTH parties doing nothing about this, I begin to wonder if either of them want to. Same with the military mail STILL requiring a postmark when none are available in Mosul... From the president on down - 4 years later the elections are the same mess. Not a very positive sign. If we want different, we'd better speak up. Democrat voter fraud helps RINO candidates.
36
posted on
12/27/2004 10:50:36 PM PST
by
supercat
(To call the Constitution a 'living document' is to call a moth-infested overcoat a 'living garment'.)
To: freespirited
This is the main reason the Democrats insist that the "homeless" have a right to vote. In addition to gaining votes of actual homeless the Democrats can also manufacture many "homeless" voter registrations. If there are 50 voters named "Mickey Mouse" and the registrations are all to non-existent addresses or to the addresses of bus stops or whatever, the Democrats can say, "Homeless people have the right to vote. The fact that these addresses are not verifiable (fictional) is proof that these voters are homeless. The fact that these registrations cannot be verified proves their validity as legitimate 'homeless' ballots." The media of course eats this up.
37
posted on
12/27/2004 10:55:17 PM PST
by
Wilhelm Tell
(Lurking since 1997!)
To: Wilhelm Tell
I don't believe anyone has yet offered a shred of evidence these people even exist. The thought of hundreds of homeless people - transient by nature and need, all scrambling to get their ballots in - the picture just isn't tuning in for me.
38
posted on
12/27/2004 11:06:59 PM PST
by
4woodenboats
(Can ya smell that smell? It's the smell of voter fraud, and WA state reeks of it!!)
To: longtermmemmory
Longterm, you could not be more correct when you wrote
Being the "noble" agrieved looser is not going to cut it this time. No More Mister Fraudulent-Voter-Appeaser Guys! (AKA Magnanimous Republican candidates)
39
posted on
12/27/2004 11:08:13 PM PST
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: keithtoo
I feel so absolutely sure that it was this wandering pack of non-residents that the Rat party hooked up with that got Maria Cantwell elected by the the mere 2000 "provisional" votes that came in late from Kink co......
what ever happened to having to establish residency in a place before you could vote...like 6 months or so?
a citizen who LIVES in an area for a required amount of time has more invested in that area.....and as the theory goes, more apt to take his or her voting choices seriously.....
Democrat party is the fraud party, no question about it....
40
posted on
12/27/2004 11:16:05 PM PST
by
cherry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson