To: wagglebee
Who really cares.....this is long past...besides why not shoot the flight down if it was intended to hit another place in DC...we were under attack....Geeezzzz...isn't that why we have an Air Force!!! I for one would expect our leaders to step up to the plate when under attack and attack back, immediately.
121 posted on
12/28/2004 11:42:51 AM PST by
shield
(The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
To: shield
The problem as I see it is the fact that we were all told the "Let's Roll" story. If the President feels that it is necessary to misinform the public about all of the details of the downing of Flight 93, for whatever reason at all, that is fine. However, EVERYONE who knows about it needs to "stick with the story" forever. There is no doubt in my mind that Flight 93 was going down and everyone onboard was going to die, I don't see any way of avoiding that. If a decision was made to destroy the plane to minimize collateral damage, I think it was a good idea. Rumsfeld knows that there have been questions about Flight 93 since day one, it would seem to me that the best course of action would be to never bring it up unless it was unavoidable!
123 posted on
12/28/2004 11:54:04 AM PST by
wagglebee
(Memo to sKerry: the only thing Bush F'ed up was your career)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson