[Cold Heat]

It really is a simple matter to debunk.

The plane auger-ed in under full thrust.

If it were shot down, it would not be so, and the plane would likely not have been in one piece. It was, and it did. So it could not have been shot down. All audio tapes and phone conversations via cell phone also indicate this.

So, there really should be no fuss.

[cyncooper]

For most people there was no "debunking" needed as the rational types understood plain English.

[SFC Chromey]

Then there is the 9/11 Commission report that clearly states all 'conspiracy theories' are simply false.

Now THAT is an interesting read!

[reagan_fanatic]

If it were shot down, it would not be so, and the plane would likely not have been in one piece. It was, and it did. So it could not have been shot down. All audio tapes and phone conversations via cell phone also indicate this

Stop confusing people with facts!

[Ronaldus Magnus]

The plane auger-ed in under full thrust. If it were shot down, it would not be so, and the plane would likely not have been in one piece.

Finally, a theory that fully explains the reports that a one-ton section of the engine was found over a mile away and other light debris was found scattered over eight miles away! I have no doubt that Sec. Rumsfeld (whom I respect greatly) misspoke, the question is whether his misstatement was in fact a rare revelation of the truth.

[rahbert]

do they have engine data to confirm that the engines were
intact on impact???

the flight was fairly close to camp david and 120 or so miles from wash dc. a shootdown would have to had happened
fairly close to where flt 93 went down in order to avoid a crash in a populated area.

i can understand a shootdown being necessary, as well as the desire to keep the fact of it a secret. it would be interesting to know if the wreckage bore evidence of
sidewinder fragmentation.