Posted on 12/27/2004 7:55:49 PM PST by wagglebee
WOW! Did I touch a nerve. This is exactly what I said, "You can call me a conspiracy nut if you want but I am not sold on the idea that the plane was not shot down."
I did not say it had not been taken over by terrorists. You act like I am discounting the action of terrorists on it. I am not. I do know that terrorists took that plane over. Now go back and read my quote. The shooting down that I refer to happens after the terrorists take over the plane.
This is what I believe: Stoe said authorities initially insisted crash debris could not have traveled over a mountain ridge more than eight miles from the crash.
How about providing some information that says that her claims are true?
They have never been denied by investigators.
Now, how about providing some information that proves her claim is untrue?
Einstein how many engines does a 757 have??
Hint: less than 3 and more than 1….
"Late yesterday afternoon, however, FBI Special Agent Bill Crowley said experts from the National Transportation Safety Board had checked weather reports and determined that lightweight materials might well have traveled over the mountain by a southwest wind that reached a speed of 9 knots.
"The NTSB says it is not only plausible, but probable," said Crowley. "
"Late yesterday afternoon, however, FBI Special Agent Bill Crowley said experts from the National Transportation Safety Board had checked weather reports and determined that lightweight materials might well have traveled over the mountain by a southwest wind that reached a speed of 9 knots.
Could these be the same FBI agents who insist that Flight 800 was brought down by a defect in the fuel tank? Sure sounds like it to me.
9 knots of wind. Wow, a person would certainly have to be anchored down to keep from blowing away. By the way, did you notice the smoke plume at the crash site? It was going straight up. How do your FBI agents explain that? Lull in the wind?
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/search/s_12967.html
Great map of the debris field, I just can't get to post.
Oops. I attributed a previous statement to you, put it together with this statement, and responded to something that wasn't even there. Just ignore me.
Yes I'm serious. Unfortunately, I'm also confused. LOL See my post #68.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1309347/posts?page=68#68
What an overt display of closed-mindedness.
As far as I know, the FBI never made a determination about TWA 800. But 9 knots of wind is more than enough to blow a burning piece of check stub 8 miles. And without seeing video or a series of photographs of smoke from a fireball, there isn't any way of determining which way the wind is blowing (or how hard). I don't believe a video of the fireball from Flight 93 exists. What does exist is weather observations from the region on 11 September 2001. They say the wind was blowing in a southeasterly direction at 9 knots. Unless you believe the NTSB changed all the weather reports, I'd say it is pretty safe to assume the wind was blowing at about 9 knots that day.
I thought that I read he actually said 'brought down' the plane, but some folks heard it as 'shot down'.
By Wednesday morning, crash debris began washing ashore at the marina. Fleegle said there was something that looked like a rib bone amid pieces of seats, small chunks of melted plastic and checks
Explain how the wind blew this stuff into the lake. Also, you do not need to see a video of the smoke from the crash. The still photo shows the smoke going straight up. If there was a breeze the direction of the smoke would not be going straight up.
The FBI backed the finding of the Flight 800 investigation saying it was a fuel tank problem. They discounted all the eyewitness reports and did not even investigate them.
yeah I don't remember there being anything left of the plane at the crash scene.
http://www.steinbergrecherche.com/UA93d.jpg
This plane was crashed due to passenger interference with the original plan.
There is no evidence but pure speculation to suggest otherwise, and what difference does it make anyway.
Those who start with the assumption that every official story is laced with lies and propaganda need to be taking more meds.
If you don't fix that, you will hurt yourselves. You will join the ranks of the silliest conspiracy nuts on the planet, a trophy now in the possession of the Russians.
They think they know the real truth when in reality, their conspiratorial nature is being used by the government to control their behavior.
While I do not buy the official line about the center fuel tank garbage, I do not believe there is any reason to think that this particular incident happened any differently.
Like I said there was not any wind that morning.
Sorry I missed your post. Thanks for verifying that.
I agree .. but some hang on those mispokes and won't let go
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
