Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ichneumon
Please *THINK* before posting, and step *away* from the crystal meth...

I like your scientific approach to your opposition. It's what makes you stand out. If you followed the link to Fox News, you'd see who wrote the material. Are you accusing Bill of being on meth?

You're too easy... which is another reason your "debate" with Johnson doesn't ring true.

253 posted on 12/28/2004 12:37:19 AM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]


To: Dataman
[Please *THINK* before posting, and step *away* from the crystal meth... ]

I like your scientific approach to your opposition. It's what makes you stand out.

Thank you.

If you followed the link to Fox News, you'd see who wrote the material. Are you accusing Bill of being on meth?

No, please work on your reading comprehension -- I'm accusing *you* of being delusional for *your* linkage of O'Reilly's point with (*gasp*) the defense of evolutionary biology (and other sciences). That was all *your* fantasy, O'Reilly made no such connection, most likely because he's *not* a paranoid maniac on the topic of evolution, unlike some people I could name.

Are we clear now, son?

You're too easy...

Clearly, you're a legend in your own mind.

which is another reason your "debate" with Johnson doesn't ring true.

Let me get this straight -- you think it's somehow wildly beyond credibility that when Phillip Johnson dropped into talk.origins a few times in the early 1990's (established fact) when I was posting there during the same period (also an easily established fact), I managed to exchange posts with him on the subject of the newsgroup?

I repeat -- step *away* from the drugs, and attempt to *think* before you post, lest you continue to make a fool of yourself.

256 posted on 12/28/2004 12:49:08 AM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]

To: Dataman; Ichneumon

I took a look at O'Reilly's essay on Christmas. It has nothing whatsoever to do with creation OR "Intelligent Design."

I don't much care for O'Reilly, but he's just a journalist, not a scientist.

Real scientists, as you know, look on Young Earth Creationists as little more than banjo playing snake handlers, descended from generations of people whose parents were a little too closely related.

There are plenty of people who believe:

- that God created the Universe at least 11 billion years ago;

- that God created the Earth at least 4 billion years ago;

- that life on earth evolved according to natural scientific principles which were established by God untold eons ago;

- that none of this has any place in a science class, because science classes are about the natural world, not the supernatural world.

As you also know. You've certainly seen me post it to you more than once.


274 posted on 12/28/2004 3:14:38 AM PST by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson