Veto! wrote:The Los Angeles Times is the source of that 100 feet figure. I'm not sure where they got it.
wolfpatwrote:.I've heard this rumor but not from what I consider a reliable source. Do you have a reliable source?
I'm amazed that all of Sumatra is 100 feet over from where it was a couple of days ago.
I've seen other, more "scientific" reports say that somewhere between 10 meters and 40 feet of the Indian plate subducted below the Myanmar (Burma) plate.
I got it from Drudge. As far as I'm concerned, that's almost as good as Matthew, Mark, Luke or John.