Sorry, but you only rate a D+ for that effort to wriggle out of the conundrum you've talked your way into. You started this thread with the wildly stupid notion that "lower level officers and enlisted men" actually "hold the keys to about a 100 nuclear warheads". Where's your proof for that reckless charge? Obviously, the actual keys to the Pakistani nukes are held by the general staff that prosecuted these miscreants. Only an idiot would believe otherwise.
Once again you've come to the Free Republic forum to try to sow your seeds of dissent by whipping up fear and loathing against Musharraf, Pakistan and U.S. foreign policy, with another blatantly false charge for which neither you, nor the story, offered even one iota of proof. You are dishonest.
• "...it is reasonable to think of the word mutiny."
But that's not what you did, is it? You didn't just think the word "mutiny", rather you willfully chose to commit a fraud upon the forum by falsely changing the title to lead off with "Mutiny in the Pakistan army", when you knew perfectly well that no such word or phrase could be found in the actual title or body of the story. You are dishonest.
Take your irrational anti-Pakistan bias and paranoia somewhere else.
--Boot Hill
Candy Gram to Boot Hill -> When you hit the bottom, stop digging.
You conveniently ignore the fact that the US government and law enforcement have explicitly stated their worries not just about nuclear warheads, but nuclear fuel being used in dirty bombs. Do you have any proof that the Pakistani Generals control all their country's nuclear fuel? You obviously don't.
Secondly, why don't you show us the proof for your claim that Pakistan's nuclear warheads are sitting at the back of a US C-130? Cat got your tongue?
Once again you've come to the Free Republic forum to try to sow your seeds of dissent by whipping up fear and loathing against Musharraf, Pakistan and U.S. foreign policy, with another blatantly false charge for which neither you, nor the story, offered even one iota of proof. You are dishonest.
Let's see. A person who guesses that the US controls Pakistan's nukes and assures his fellow forum members that everything's hunky dory based on the guess.
versus
A person who cogently lays out arguments about how Pakistan's warheads and nculear fuel are guarded by Al Qaida sympathizers and substantiates it with multiple links and sources.
Who's dishonest here? Your honesty lies in the rear end of a C-130 that flew out a long time ago.
But that's not what you did, is it? You didn't just think the word "mutiny", rather you willfully chose to commit a fraud upon the forum by falsely changing the title to lead off with "Mutiny in the Pakistan army", when you knew perfectly well that no such word or phrase could be found in the actual title or body of the story. You are dishonest.
Aw poor baby. Did I hurt your feelings by making you think?
What I did was perfectly fine because the purport of the article I posted was reflected in the title. You are just pissed because it upsets your carefully constructed fictional world.
Take your irrational anti-Pakistan bias and paranoia somewhere else.
No. And unlike you, I'm not going to ask you to take your GIS based intellectual diarrhea that you pass for analysis elsewhere.
Why? I'm not afraid to debate. But if you are afraid to argue and debate based on facts - tough.
I'm here to stay and will not hesitate to burst your bubble. Any time, any day. Try looking that up in a map. And stop the personal attacks, which is a known forum rule that you violate at will.
But since you got beat in the debate, you are trying to shift the goalposts.
I notice that in that same post (#30), you say:
Obviously, the actual keys to the Pakistani nukes are held by the general staff that prosecuted these miscreants.
Do you have any proof that the same men - individuals who prosecuted the specific individuals mentioned in the article actually hold the keys to Pakistan's nukes?
If you cannot prove that those specific Generals hold the nuclear keys, do you admit to being a liar?
Two can play this game.