But since you got beat in the debate, you are trying to shift the goalposts.
I notice that in that same post (#30), you say:
Obviously, the actual keys to the Pakistani nukes are held by the general staff that prosecuted these miscreants.
Do you have any proof that the same men - individuals who prosecuted the specific individuals mentioned in the article actually hold the keys to Pakistan's nukes?
If you cannot prove that those specific Generals hold the nuclear keys, do you admit to being a liar?
Two can play this game.
That would be incorrect, once again. How about instead of you trying to conjure up your own idea about what I "understood", let me set you straight. First, review what you posted in #1...
"This is serious stuff. These guys hold the keys to about a 100 nuclear warheads!" --Saberwielder at #1That was in the first post after the thread article, and as such, the immediate antecedent to your use of the phrase "These guys..." was the thread article, whose central thesis, in both title and opening paragraph, was "30 Pakistan Army and Air Force personnel". You subsequently refined your description of "these guys" (in post #22), as being "lower level officers and enlisted men". So what we were left with is that "these guys" were...
"30 Pakistan Army and Air Force personnel" who were "lower level officers and enlisted men".Now even if we accept your novel spin and last-minute retraction, that maybe you were referring to "army officers and enlisted men in general", and not the 30 soldiers that were at the heart of the thread article, we are still left with the second question unanswered.
Post the proof to back up your reckless and false defamation against Mushi, and Bush's foreign policy in Pakistan, or retract it.
--Boot Hill