Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Mutiny in the Pakistan army?] - 30 More Pakistani Soldiers to Get Death Penalty for Indiscipline
South Asia Tribune ^ | December 26, 2004 | M.T.Butt

Posted on 12/26/2004 6:35:58 PM PST by Saberwielder

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: Saberwielder
"It is a well known fact that except in times of war, Pakistan stores these warheads in parts, with the nuclear fuel and the detonation mechanism separately."

Assuming, arguendo, that to be a fact, it merely adds fuel to my argument that you have provided no proof (and especially not in your off-point obfuscations in post #38) to support your lie that these "lower level officers and enlisted men" actually "hold the keys to about a 100 nuclear warheads". So are you finally prepared to admit that there is no actual proof for that reckless accusation?

--Boot Hill

41 posted on 01/01/2005 6:18:36 PM PST by Boot Hill (Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
What do you want? Names, ranks and video tapes of the troops opening the silos?

You are such a joke. My argument above proves conclusively that Pakistani lower level officers and enlisted men hold the keys to Pakistan's nuclear warheads.

Now, why don't you be a man and answer my questions. That is assuming you have a backbone.

42 posted on 01/01/2005 6:31:37 PM PST by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
BTW, since you have claimed on many separate posts that my claim - " "lower level officers and enlisted men" actually "hold the keys to about a 100 nuclear warheads" is a lie - why don't you PROVE your claim or withdraw it.

I put up. Now you put up or shut up.

43 posted on 01/01/2005 6:33:29 PM PST by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Saberwielder

I've read yer article ya posted and can't find anywhere that these troops in trouble hold the keys to a nuclear weapons storage facility.....can't ya direct me to that part ?


44 posted on 01/01/2005 6:47:20 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
Where did I say that "these troops in trouble" hold the keys to a "nuclear weapons storage facility?"

Can you direct me to that part? Or do you have to communicate with Booth Hill thru Private replies to get the answer? ;)

45 posted on 01/01/2005 6:50:45 PM PST by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Tarpaulin
So, kill them already!

They're going to die a lot quicker than Scott Peterson.

46 posted on 01/01/2005 6:54:24 PM PST by airborne (Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close and safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Saberwielder

No I read that troops are in trouble , due a court martial and then down to your first post that says they own the keys to a hundred nukes...........whre did ya get that ?

Pull the chip off yer sholder and answer a simple question vs just being disruptive.


47 posted on 01/01/2005 6:56:36 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
"These guys = Pakistani troops." That is the simple anwswer.

I made it clearer in a subsequent post (#22) where I stated my claim that lower level Pakistani officers and enlisted men hold the keys to Pakistan's nukes. I substantiated that claim in Posts #35 and #40.

48 posted on 01/01/2005 7:01:10 PM PST by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Saberwielder

Do you work in a nuclear weapons site ?


49 posted on 01/01/2005 7:05:44 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Saberwielder
"My argument above proves conclusively that Pakistani lower level officers and enlisted men hold the keys to Pakistan's nuclear warheads."

Not even close, more importantly that is not what you claimed in your post #1. Go look, this is the lie that you posted there...

"This is serious stuff. These guys hold the keys to about a 100 nuclear warheads!"
"These guys" and "hold the keys". Where is your proof that "these guys" from the article had anything to do with nuclear weapons, whatsoever? And since, as you claim, the nukes are normally kept disassembled(LOL), how could anyone, especially "these guys" hold the keys "to about a 100 nuclear warheads"?

Here's your job, your only job...

You started this thread with the lie that these "lower level officers and enlisted men" actually "hold the keys to about a 100 nuclear warheads". Where is your proof for that reckless accusation?

--Boot Hill

50 posted on 01/01/2005 7:08:25 PM PST by Boot Hill (Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

No.


51 posted on 01/01/2005 7:08:37 PM PST by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Saberwielder

I was just impressed with your knowledge of such terms as PAL........what does that stand for ?


52 posted on 01/01/2005 7:09:37 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
This thread has conclusively proven that you, Boot Hill, are an incompetent debater and have the intellectual integrity of Baghdad Bob. Some specifics:

1. You questioned a claim of mine, but hide behind "forum policy" to avoid answering a bogus claim made by you.

2. When I questioned something you posted elsewhere you said it was against forum policy, but you turned around and questioned something that I posted on another thread.

3. You consistently ignored my specific, detailed answers to your question, but you repeatedly ignore the specific questions that were posed to you.

The only conclusion that can be made is that you've got nothing. Nada. Zippo. Bupkus.

53 posted on 01/01/2005 7:10:19 PM PST by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
See this site for a discussion on Permissive Action Links for nuclear weapons
54 posted on 01/01/2005 7:13:07 PM PST by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Saberwielder

Oh ....I thought you knew this stuff....you got all yer info on this on the internet or are ya just directing me there to learn ?


55 posted on 01/01/2005 7:18:52 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

I have written about PALs and the legality of the US offering them to friendly countries. It was for a commissioned study.


56 posted on 01/01/2005 7:25:23 PM PST by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Saberwielder
Sorry, but whining and changing the subject just won't work. Here's what you need to be working on...

"This is serious stuff. These guys hold the keys to about a 100 nuclear warheads!"   --Saberwielder at #1
"These guys" and "hold the keys". Where is your proof that "these guys" from the article had anything to do with nuclear weapons, whatsoever, muchless held the keys to 100 nukes? And perhaps more importantly, since you claim, the nukes are normally kept disassembled (LOL), how could anyone, especially "these guys" hold the keys "to about a 100 nuclear warheads" if they're disassembled?

Post the proof to back up your reckless accusations or retrack.

--Boot Hill

57 posted on 01/01/2005 7:26:59 PM PST by Boot Hill (Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Saberwielder

ping


58 posted on 01/01/2005 7:28:38 PM PST by Ciexyz (I use the term Blue Cities, not Blue States. PA is red except for Philly, Pgh & Erie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
Proven beyond doubt in posts #35 and #40.

Stop moving the goalposts and get a life.

59 posted on 01/01/2005 7:30:06 PM PST by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Saberwielder

We give these things to foreign countries ? Whats the basis or purpose of a PAL....what does it really do ?


60 posted on 01/01/2005 7:30:46 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson