1. You questioned a claim of mine, but hide behind "forum policy" to avoid answering a bogus claim made by you.
2. When I questioned something you posted elsewhere you said it was against forum policy, but you turned around and questioned something that I posted on another thread.
3. You consistently ignored my specific, detailed answers to your question, but you repeatedly ignore the specific questions that were posed to you.
The only conclusion that can be made is that you've got nothing. Nada. Zippo. Bupkus.
"This is serious stuff. These guys hold the keys to about a 100 nuclear warheads!" --Saberwielder at #1"These guys" and "hold the keys". Where is your proof that "these guys" from the article had anything to do with nuclear weapons, whatsoever, muchless held the keys to 100 nukes? And perhaps more importantly, since you claim, the nukes are normally kept disassembled (LOL), how could anyone, especially "these guys" hold the keys "to about a 100 nuclear warheads" if they're disassembled?
Post the proof to back up your reckless accusations or retrack.
--Boot Hill