Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
The point of the article is not that the distribution of these observations is normal, but that the observations fall well within the normal distribution of human population weights and heights, so it is not evident, at least from these measurements, that they are from different species.

The problem is that such a "weights and heights" measure is an extremely simplistic measure. Just because there are modern humans who are midgets, that doesn't mean that an Australopithecus would be taken for a "normal" modern human if one were to be brought to the present using a time machine. You'd still freak out if you saw one walk into the 7-11.

I don't know *any* modern humans who look even remotely like *this*:

Massive brow ridge, *NO* forehead, a braincase you could wrap your hand around like a football, a prominent protruding muzzle, small close-set eyes, jawbone larger than the braincase, etc. etc. Compare to the proportions and angles of a modern human skull:


14 posted on 12/25/2004 10:23:31 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Ichneumon
I don't know *any* modern humans who look even remotely like *this*:

You haven't looked around enough:

22 posted on 12/26/2004 9:42:44 AM PST by PatrickHenry (PatrickHenry's law: If each event in a causal chain is natural, the totality is natural.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson