Threat Matrix: Daily Terror Threat

Threat Matrix: Daily Terror Threat

Thread Twenty-Three (Index)

Google News : Google Images : News Hotlinks

The Threat Matrix

The title refers to a daily report given to the president of the United States detailing the most serious terrorist threats against the country. To tackle those threats, the government has formed a top-notch task force to infiltrate the terror cells and cut off the danger.

"Every morning, the president receives a list of the top ten terrorist threats - this list is known as the threat matrix."

We here at FR are trying to be in conjunction with the daily reports around the world that involve threats. We try to provide a storehouse of information that takes hours of research.

YOU be the judge and get informed!

LNG ship attack a potential disaster
Full Story

WASHINGTON - A terrorist attack on a tanker loaded with liquefied natural gas could cause massive damage a third of a mile away and could send a vapor cloud billowing more than 1.5 miles, government scientists say.

With the the nation clamoring for more natural gas, policy-makers are trying to figure out how to safely import large quantities of liquefied natural gas or LNG.

"I will never cower before any master nor bend to any threat."

Threat Matrix "TM'er" Tips

Link to Thread Twenty-Two

"Code Red Implications:
Code Red - Stay Home and Await Word."
From Tm'er and Freeper ~MamaDearest~

Cindy's Links of Interest

TM Code of Conduct

ExSoldier's Invaluable Tips

TM's 'Be on the Lookout'

Godzilla's Summaries

Threat Matrix Book List

Arabic Image Links

ALL,
I think that we discussed this months ago as a deterrent to OBL. Great idea!

Has U.S. threatened to vaporize Mecca?

Intelligence expert says nuke option is reason bin Laden has been quiet
Posted: January 7, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

Why hasn't Osama bin Laden's terror network executed an attack on U.S. soil since 9-11?

Simple, says Dr. Jack Wheeler, creator of an acclaimed intelligence website dubbed "the oasis for rational conservatives": The U.S. has threatened to nuke the Muslim holy city of Mecca should the terror leader strike America again.

On his website, To the Point, Wheeler explains how the Bush administration has identified the potential of wiping Mecca off the map as bin Laden's ultimate point of vulnerability – the Damoclean Sword hanging over his head.

"Israel … recognizes that the Aswan Dam is Egypt's Damoclean Sword," writes Wheeler. "There is no possibility whatever of Egypt's winning a war with Israel, for if Aswan is blown, all of inhabited Egypt is under 20 feet of water. Once the Israelis made this clear to the Egyptians, the possibility of any future Egyptian attack on Israel like that of 1948, 1967, and 1972 is gone."

Wheeler says talk of bin Laden's Damoclean Sword has infiltrated the Beltway.

Writes Wheeler in his members-only column: "There has been a rumor floating in the Washington ether for some time now that George Bush has figured out what Sword of Damocles is suspended over Osama bin Laden's head. It's whispered among Capitol Hill staffers on the intel and armed services committees; White House NSC (National Security Council) members clam up tight if you begin to hint at it; and State Department neo-cons love to give their liberal counterparts cardiac arrhythmia by elliptically conversing about it in their presence.

"The whispers and hints and ellipses are getting louder now because the rumor explains the inexplicable: Why hasn't there been a repeat of 9-11? How can it be that after this unimaginable tragedy and Osama's constant threats of another, we have gone over three years without a single terrorist attack on American soil?"

Available only to subscribers of To the Point, Wheeler ends his column by explaining the effectiveness of the Mecca threat.

"Completely obliterating the terrorists' holiest of holies, rendering what is for them the world's most sacred spot a radioactive hole in the ground is retribution of biblical proportions – and those are the only proportions that will do the job.

"Osama would have laughed off such a threat, given his view that Americans are wussies who cut and run after a few losses, such as Lebanon in 1983 and Somalia in 1993. Part of Bush's rationale for invading Afghanistan and Iraq – obviously never expressed publicly – was to convince Osama that his threat to nuke Mecca was real. Osama hates America just as much as ever, but he is laughing no more."

Wheeler says bin Laden is "playing poker with a Texas cowboy holding the nuclear aces," so there's nothing al-Qaida could do that could come remotely close to risking obliterating Mecca.

Writes Wheeler: "So far, Osama has decided not to see if GW is bluffing. Smart move."

If you'd like to sound off on this issue, please take part in the WorldNetDaily poll.

Subscribe to Wheeler's To the Point intelligence website and read insightful, clear analysis every day.

Stratfor Founder Said 9/11 Attack Designed to Draw U.S. into Combat

Stratfor Founder Said 9/11 Attack Designed to Draw U.S. into Combat Intelligence Expert Noted Jihadi Victory Over USSR As Watershed Event Addressing JINSA’s Board of Directors on November 14 2004, Dr. George Friedman, founder and chairman of Stratfor, the world’s leading privately held intelligence company, discussed al Qaeda’s origins and explained how that history ties to both the events of September 11 as well as the current war in Iraq. According to Friedman, the war in Iraq was born out of the Cold War. His conclusion comes mainly from the fact that the U.S. trained Islamic jihadists so that they could defeat the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. Up until this point an Islamic force had not fought and won a war. Afghanistan, however, was different. Friedman noted that the Afghan defeat was one of the more important reasons for the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Stratfor founder Dr. George Friedman addressed the JINSA Board of Directors, November 15, 2004. After the Afghan war, these jihadists were essentially abandoned and betrayed by their supporters including Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Those states, among many others, did not want these fighters to come home after their impressive victory. Friedman compared fundamentalist fighters with American soldiers who fought in the Vietnam War. After the Vietnam War, soldiers that came home were bitter about the reception they received. One can only imagine the bitterness of an Islamic fighter not being allowed to return home after a war that they won, Friedman noted. From this crucible of rejection al Qaeda, was forged, Friedman declared.

The situation became worse when Iraq invaded Kuwait, which compelled the Saudi royal family to cooperate with the United States. Friedman explained that after seeing this cooperation, al Qaeda decided that it was time for some kind of uprising. In order to do this they needed to convince their fighters that this was their time in history to make a difference. In other words, Friedman said, al Qaeda’s leaders needed to give their followers hope. He pointed out that this was an important event since sending an army into battle without hope could likely lead to disaster.

Al Qaeda was extremely smart in deciding how to do this, Friedman said. They would plan an attack to elicit a response from the United States that would be beneficial to their cause. They knew that the United States would respond in one of two ways. If al Qaeda attacked and the United States did not respond with military force, it could prove that the United States was not a great power and that they were weaker than anticipated. The second response, however, would be even better. If the United States responded with a multi-front attack on Islamic terrorists in Muslim countries, al Qaeda could easily persuade their fighters that the United States was making war on all Muslims. For a while, al Qaeda attacks such as the first World Trade Center bombing, failed to get the United States to respond with great military force.

The attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, however, were designed to be so terrible, that the U.S. would not be able to decline combat, Friedman said. He pointed to al Qaeda’s mastery of covert operations and understanding of the American intelligence as reason for their success on September 11. Because of this success they helped draw America into an armed conflict with Iraq, a country with a Muslim majority, Friedman concluded.

Rapporteur’s summary by JINSA Editorial Assistant James Cetrone

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1315934/posts

Expect Change in al Qaeda Tactics

Senior Analyst Tells JINSA Board to Expect Change in al Qaeda Tactics Stratfor’s Burton Said Law Enforcement Must See Potential Targets Like Terrorists Fred Burton, Vice President for Global Security and Counterterrorism at Stratfor, the worlds leading privately held intelligence company, spoke to the JINSA Board of Directors on November 15 about the threats that the United States faces from al Qaeda, and how America can better fight terrorists. Burton first explained his views on terrorism and how it differs from many other counter terrorism experts including Stratfor’s founder and president, Dr. George Friedman, who also addressed the JINSA Board. “George looks at the problem from 30,000 feet. I basically look at the problem from the last one hundred yards.”

Stratfor Vice President Fred Burton addressed the JINSA Board of Directors, November 15, 2004. Burton has a long list of credentials when it comes to counter terrorism. He served with the Secret Service protecting Vice President Bush during President Ronald Reagan’s first term. He then became a Special Agent involved in counterterrorism for the State Department. Burton’s work at the State Department led to both arrests and successfully foiled terrorist plots. Burton discussed a range of topics dealing with issues such as the next potential target of al Qaeda in America and how to combat it, terrorist sleeper cells in America, and the “lone wolf threat.”

Burton predicted that future al Qaeda attacks would be more simplistic in both their operations and their targets. He used the example of the recent assassination of Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh in Amsterdam. A single gunman later identified as a fundamentalist Muslim, killed Van Gogh and pinned a note to his body deploring critical attitudes toward Islam. Van Gogh had recently released a film dealing with brutality towards women in Muslim societies. This is the kind of terrorist attack that we will begin to see in America, Burton predicted. We have many high profile individuals who, like Theo Van Gogh, are vulnerable to attack. According to Burton, “you can no longer even think about blowing up the White House, the Pentagon, the State Department, or the President of the United States. Trust me, I’ve been there and done that and you are not going to be able to do it.” A more likely al Qaeda attack would involve killing a few key CEOs at the same time or attacking a few major companies at the same time. The best way to combat this kind of terrorism is to engage in counter surveillance to look for the pre operation surveillance indicators. According to Burton, law enforcement must have counter-surveillance in place to observe terrorists engaging in preoperational information gathering like videotaping.

Policemen inspect the explosion site at the Marriott hotel in Islamabad, 28 October 2004. The United States believes the blast was caused by a bomb and not an electrical short circuit as Pakistani officials have said, the State Department reported. (AFP/Jewel Samad) Burton next dealt with the issue of sleeper cells. He explained that there are some three to five al Qaeda sleeper cells left in the United States; one in New York/New Jersey, one in Washington D.C., one in Houston, Texas, one in Los Angeles, and one more that is at large. Burton claimed that law enforcement is key. Allowing them to get information to the public about potential terrorist plots is very important in combating attacks carried out by sleeper cells. Burton pointed to soft targets like hotels and corporations as al Qaeda’s future targets. As an example, he cited the recent bombing of a Marriott hotel in Islamabad. Burton also addressed the main problem with soft targets: it is impossible to protect every potential target simply because it would be too expensive. His solution is to perform vulnerability assessments to identify the locations that are most likely to be hit by terrorist attacks. Another way to prevent casualties when dealing with soft targets is to insist on what he called “enhanced physical security.” As an example, Burton said that all vulnerable potential targets should have ballistic window film because flying glass kills the most people in a bomb blast. He also noted that buildings should have an acceptable “stand off distance” to prevent vehicle bombs from coming close enough to do serious damage.

One of the most important things that law enforcement can do with regard to counter surveillance is to see targets through the eyes of the terrorists. If one can understand how terrorists conduct their operations, they can be thwarted more effectively. Burton explained that al Qaeda figures out a way to remove the visible security as part of their attack plan. Because this is known, changes have been made to the way targets are protected by adding a level of counter-surveillance security. This is now the way most high profile CEOs are protected in America. The biggest threat in America today, according to Burton, is the “lone wolf threat.” These are Islamic extremists in America that want to do something for the movement and have no contact with a larger organization.

In closing, Burton drew a frightening comparison between America’s ability to fight terrorism and the Wizard of Oz. The wizard, whom everyone believes to be all-powerful, is actually nothing more than a frail old man. Anti-terrorist law enforcement is similar in that most Americans believe it to be much better than it actually is. Burton stressed however, that America is much better off than it was before September 11 but we still have a long way to go.

Rapporteur’s summary by JINSA Editorial Assistant James Cetrone

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1315932/posts

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.