Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CougarGA7

You're absolutely right... states like Delaware, Rhode Island, Wyoming and South Dakota that only have 3 electoral votes will never go for this. Without the Electoral College, those states lose what little power they have, and control of national elections goes to the 7 or 8 states with the highest populations (CA, TX, NY, FL, IL, MI, OH, PA). Right now California has 55 electoral votes, Rhode Island 3. Under a system based only on popular vote, without the Electoral College, it would be the equivalent of giving California 100 electoral votes and Rhode Island 3, since California has about 34 million people and Rhode Island has just over 1 million.


42 posted on 12/23/2004 8:53:19 AM PST by mysto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: mysto
I had a semi-liberal (Democrat, but drifts towards the middle) make the suggestion of eliminating the electoral college to me about a month ago.

By the time I explained to him the damage it would do to a state like New Mexico. (We would likely lose the Labs and bases to more populous states) I am proud to say he is now dead set against losing the electoral college.

These suggestions always disappear once you enable the person to think things through to a conclusion.
71 posted on 12/23/2004 9:03:29 AM PST by CougarGA7 (Merry Christmas...THERE..I SAID IT...AND THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson