Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How and why hostages freed baffles France
Guardian ^ | 12/23/04 | Jon Henley in Paris

Posted on 12/22/2004 7:05:27 PM PST by Pikamax

How and why hostages freed baffles France

Jon Henley in Paris Thursday December 23, 2004 The Guardian

Two French journalists flew home to a heroes' welcome yesterday after being held hostage in Iraq. But questions were immediately asked about exactly how and why they had been released after more than four months. Christian Chesnot and Georges Malbrunot landed at a military airfield outside Paris, hugged tearful relatives in the freezing rain, and were greeted by the prime minister, Jean-Pierre Raffarin, and President Jacques Chirac, who interrupted his Christmas holiday in Morocco to be there.

Looking fit and well, the two spoke lucidly of their 124-day ordeal. "We talked Arabic to our captors, we eased the tension whenever we could, and we trusted in France's efforts to free us," Malbrunot said. "It was a difficult experience - sometimes a very difficult experience. But we never gave up hope."

Chesnot added: "We were kept in good conditions, in five or six different houses around the country. We were not mistreated. The first few days were hard, of course. We had to record videotapes. But we understood they didn't want to kill us straight away, and we started talking to them. Gradually the pressure fell."

Commentators and opposition politicians, while expressing relief at the release, questioned why it had taken so long to free them, and what exactly had prompted their captors to do so.

"French diplomacy comes out of this episode tarnished," said the left-leaning Libération. "Its traditional Arab policy and non-alignment in the Bush crusade in Iraq did not protect it from the worst, nor carry the day on the international scene. It must draw the conclusions - and explain its failings."

Other papers said the affair was "cloaked in shadows and uncertainty", and "too bizarre to be altogether what it appears".

Mr Raffarin insisted to party leaders that the government had not paid a ransom. "The prime minister said on several occasions that there had been no ransom demand, and of course no ransom was ever mentioned or paid," said Bernard Accoyer of the governing UMP party.But François Bayrou of the conservative UDF party said he was "well aware that one has to distinguish between what a prime minister can say, and what he has to keep discreet or secret".

Jean-Marc Ayrault of the opposition Socialists said yesterday was "a day of celebration", but "a time will come for explanations".

The release was negotiated through intermediaries, according to Mr Raffarin.

According to Le Monde, up to 20 agents from France's counter-espionage agency DGSE, based in the Baghdad embassy, handled all contacts with the reporters' captors, a minor Sunni militant group calling itself the Islamic Army of Iraq, and their various emissaries.The paper quoted a government source as saying "the hypothesis of a ransom" could not be fully discounted.

Another secret service source said: "At one stage, we were actually quite annoyed that no ransom demand had been made - if it had, we would certainly have paid it then, without a second thought."

Given the necessarily opaque nature of the intelligence community and the sensitivity of hostage negotiation, it is unlikely that the full truth will be known for some time.

But sources at various government agencies told French media that repeated missions by French diplomats to several Arab countries, "including those that keep these Sunni militant groups' in funds", had probably paid off.

Chesnot, 38, of Radio France Internationale, and Malbrunot, 41, of Le Figaro, disappeared on August 20 as they were travelling from Baghdad to Najaf. Their Syrian driver was freed in November.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: frenchhostages; iraq

1 posted on 12/22/2004 7:05:28 PM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

France is baffled. Sorry Jacques, you'll just have to surrender faster next time.


2 posted on 12/22/2004 7:07:28 PM PST by Bernard (Caution Ahead - Road being Paved with Good Intentions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"...French journalists flew home to a heroes' welcome yesterday after being held hostage..."

Oohhh! sacre bleu!!! you were held hostage and then got away unharmed and little worse for wear...mon dieu, you're my hero!

Of course the French would welcome them as heroes. They'd welcome them as conquerers if they'd managed to run away without being captured, but sometimes sacrifices must be made. Les Français me font le vomi de projectile.

3 posted on 12/22/2004 7:12:53 PM PST by infidel29 (America is GREAT because she is GOOD, the moment she ceases to be GOOD, she ceases to be GREAT - B.F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bernard

Well the French would be baffled. They couldn't even name a French holiday for the hostage takers before the French were set free. They're probably sitting around in small groups with puzzled looks on their faces.

For the record, I'm very glad the French hostages were released. I don't want to see one unnecessary life taken in Iraq.


4 posted on 12/22/2004 7:19:33 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Al Qaeda got a load of brie?


5 posted on 12/22/2004 7:23:26 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

'Baffle' looks a lot like 'waffle.' How French...


6 posted on 12/22/2004 7:25:12 PM PST by Skywarner (Enjoying freedom? Thank a Veteran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

They were freed because they are Franco-Islamo-fascist spies.


7 posted on 12/22/2004 7:35:09 PM PST by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
According to Le Monde, up to 20 agents from France's counter-espionage agency DGSE, based in the Baghdad embassy, handled all contacts with the reporters' captors

Gee, I wonder if any of those agents have been in Mosul lately.

8 posted on 12/22/2004 7:36:18 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bernard
"Christmas holiday in Morocco"

Why can't Jac enjoy Christmas at home instead of a likely Islamic stronghold?

9 posted on 12/22/2004 7:47:25 PM PST by Paladin2 (SeeBS News - We Decide, We Create, We Report - In that order! - ABC - Already Been Caught)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Chesnot added: "We were kept in good conditions, in five or six different houses around the country. We were not mistreated. The first few days were hard, of course. We had to record videotapes. But we understood they didn't want to kill us straight away, and we started talking to them. Gradually the pressure fell."

TRANSLATION: We went straight to terror alert condition #4 - COLLABORATION...and it worked!!!


10 posted on 12/22/2004 7:53:08 PM PST by shibumi ("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." - John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
The reporters initially agreed, in return for freedom, to slavishly and without question present any anti-American argument at any time. The Muslim were not impressed because they already had that.

The French were finally able to collaborate on providing the Muslim terrorist with the names of other reporters, especially those working for Reuters and the BBC, who the Froggies thought might be selling the IDF targeting information on Hamas people all over the region. Alas, the Froggies gave up the names of EVERYONE (they have years of experience collaborating with the enemy, you know) and the terrorists released them just to get rid of them.

11 posted on 12/22/2004 8:20:21 PM PST by Tacis (Kerry - You Can't Make A Silk Purse Out Of A Lazy, Lying, Elitist Scumbag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Soon as they found out they captured Frenchmen they must have been disappointed and lost interest knowing the French surrendered long ago and there was nothing to gain. The French will be the first to go under Islamic rule by the radicals.
12 posted on 12/22/2004 8:24:43 PM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
I don't understand why anyone is baffeled!

Simple, the terrorists know that france is their friend, and always has been, starting with giving the Ayatolla Khomehni refugee status before he took over Iran.

France was one of the greatest beneficiaries of the blood food for oil scandal, and they the french were set to get hundreds of billions of dollars in payoffs had Hussien been able to stay in power. The french were also leaking inteligence info to Hussien, as well as delivering weapons to them, and helping them to hide their weapons programs, right up till the invasion.

And I have no doubt that bushells of money were involved here as well, cash that will be buying weapons and explosives to kill American soldiers.

Yup, the french are our friends.

Mark

13 posted on 12/22/2004 8:38:07 PM PST by MarkL (Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But it rocks absolutely, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson