Posted on 12/21/2004 3:55:29 PM PST by Mike Fieschko
I agree.
I think we need to make more noise about the illegality of him running for office of any kind much more public.
bump!!
kerry, you lying b@stard, not all of them are back, but some of us will never forget, and will be honored to represent them.
You weren't there long enough to build a lot of memories, so I'll help you out....we used to have a saying..."War is hell, but payback is a mother f*****."
Try to work that into your next campaign...think of it as a string around your finger.
Git em!
Under Art III Sec 3 of the Constitution, Kerry is not qualified to be a Senator. We should have him removed.
what is the breakdown on the rest of the 434 million...who received/spent the rest?
Probably the last loosing candidate to run again four years later was Adlai Stevenson. He ran in 1952 against Eisenhower, lost, and ran again in 1956 against Eisenhower and lost again.
For the record, John F'n Kerry is no Adlai Stevenson.
This reminds me... I have been trying to find a "Hanoi John" urinal sticker... also a "Hahoi Jane" urinal sticker, but have thus far only located the Jane version. Also, the web sites I've found it on are ones that I've been hesitant to give my credit card. Anyone have a good spot to purchase them?
If Kerry thinks he'll be successful four years from now, he'd better start watching his back. Hillary will have him Vince Fosterized in a New York minute. She's certainly not going to let the likes of him get in her way. I'd pay admission to watch that match.
John McCain may be in trouble. He teamed up with Kerry on those Vietnam junkets that didn't help get back our POWs.
Excellent. Keep after him, Swifties!
The National Lampoon once featured a computerized dream fight between William Calley and Charles Manson. Hillary vs the gigolo would be in that sort of category.
Swift Boat Vets ping.
Good. Target this socialist so he cannot even attempt to give Hitlery a run for her money in '08.
Swiftees need to concentrate on running that miserable, dishonorable sonofabitch out of the Senate and then out of the United States!
I'll continue to contribute to them if they take on that action plan!
Thanks for the ping!
Actually, I believe the ads themselves were less effective then they were / are given credit for.
It was the response of the Democrats themselves to the SB and POW veterans that did the most damage, IMHO.
Individual behavior counts a lot more than an accusation.
When the Democrats attacked the SBVT, and did so viciously, the American people were able to see the black heart of the Democrats. It was ugly.
Personally, I was / am a lot more riled up by the Democrats, such as Larry O'Donnel and now Mike McCurry than I ever was by the SBVT ads themselves.
These people are ugly (I mean that in terms of their spirit). I think most people were disgusted.
As much as this evokes a very negative emotion in me, I hope the Demoncrats never learn this lesson. Indeed, if you listen to all of the post-election discussion among Democrats, their opinion is that they did not respond strongly enough!!! Good. It will hurt them even more the next time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.