To: St. Johann Tetzel
The director of a homosexual lobby group publicly admitting that "homosexual activists have pressured Target to stop supporting The Salvation Army" constitutes "suspicions, innuendo and supposition" in your mind? Please explain. Assuming I believe the guy (and there doesn't seem to be any reason not to) it states that Target was pressured, not that Target gave into said pressure. It also doesn't spell out what type of pressure was brought to bear.
Could be chest-thumping for all I know.
313 posted on
12/22/2004 12:36:09 PM PST by
Egon
(Government is a guard-dog to be fed, not a cow to be milked.)
To: Egon
That was my take on it, too; it pays to think through things before you jump (but that counsel needs to go elsewhere, as I can see you already understand that)...
316 posted on
12/22/2004 12:40:36 PM PST by
Orgiveme
(Give me liberty orgiveme death!)
To: Egon
Assuming I believe the guy (and there doesn't seem to be any reason not to) it states that Target was pressured, not that Target gave into said pressure. It also doesn't spell out what type of pressure was brought to bear. Good observations. I agree.
Could be chest-thumping for all I know.
Could be.
But its more than enough to raise the evidence at hand from "suspicions, innuendo and supposition" to firm (if not yet verified) circumstantial evidence, no? In no way however does it indict Target of being in bed with the sodomites.
320 posted on
12/22/2004 12:46:50 PM PST by
St. Johann Tetzel
(A fool can ask more questions than a wise man can answer -or- Not every question deserves an answer.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson