Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Americans Lured to Look at Digital Cameras
Associated Press via MyWay.com ^ | December 21, 2004 | Ben Dobbin

Posted on 12/21/2004 5:43:15 AM PST by RayChuang88

ROCHESTER, N.Y. (AP) - Millions of Americans who waited patiently for the quality and convenience to leap forward and the prices to roll back are now jumping on the digital-shutterbug bandwagon.

A novelty item just four or five years ago, the digital camera is shaping up as the most popular electronics gift in 2004, according to the Consumer Electronics Association. It was runner-up in 2003 to the DVD player, the No. 1 gift since 2000.

At age 75, Marilyn Smith discovered a wealth of reasons this holiday season to switch to a digital camera. Snapping away until she gets the right shot, without worrying about film, sounded enticing. So did packing a palm-size gadget on a baggage-laden trip to Hawaii in February. But she especially liked the idea of an image stabilizer that negates wobbles.

"Why? Because I sway very easily," the retired nurse's aide explained with a hearty laugh.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cameras; digital; electronics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
I am not surprised this is happening.

The thing about digital cameras is that they now offer excellent performance in units that can be more or less the size of a credit card! At these sizes, it's a lot easier to carry cameras around for special occasions. Also, instead of being limited to 24 to 36 shots on a roll of film, you can now have hundreds of shots on a single memory card.

Is it small wonder why Kodak is agressively pushing their own line of EasyShare digital cameras and putting far less emphasis on conventional film for the consumer market?

1 posted on 12/21/2004 5:43:15 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

I waited and bought mine the other day. I still have my 35mm's but my new FujiFilm S3100 is a delight. Under $300 for a digital camera that would have been $1000 2 years ago.


2 posted on 12/21/2004 5:45:41 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Boycott Boycotts Warrior. If you aint buying call me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
I just hope all our dig pics are still accessible in 100 years.
3 posted on 12/21/2004 5:47:20 AM PST by Dallas59 ("A weak peace is worse than war" - Tacitcus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
I just hope all our dig pics are still accessible in 100 years.

Not to worry! Just choose the pics you want to keep, submit them online to the WalMart photo center, and pick them up in an hour at your local WalMart. Only $0.24 a picture and the prints are as durable as a print from a 35mm negative would be.

4 posted on 12/21/2004 5:50:38 AM PST by whd23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

I'm quite happy with my 3.3 megapixel vivitar for now. I do hope to got to a 5 mega pixel sometime soon.

Some of my pictures

http://www.worldisround.com/articles/54892/


5 posted on 12/21/2004 5:54:34 AM PST by cripplecreek (I come swinging the olive branch of peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whd23

Might try that. I have a HP 750 PCS. Ink is expensive. $30 a cartridge. It takes two, color and black.


6 posted on 12/21/2004 5:54:50 AM PST by Dallas59 ("A weak peace is worse than war" - Tacitcus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

what is nice about a good digital camera is the ease of editing the pictures though software without the need to scan the picture makes it very easy, also the savings in time/hastle and money in film development.


7 posted on 12/21/2004 5:55:14 AM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Once you have the digital files of your pictures, the only thing that need be done is that they are every so often transfered to the next storeage technological medium.

In 100,000 years, your photos will look as fresh as the day you took them. They will not fade, crack, bend or otherwise deteriate from their original quality.

That's pretty cool.


8 posted on 12/21/2004 5:57:02 AM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

I managed to pick up a returned, old stock Sony Mavica camera a few years agp, and while it's not a bad camera, there are lots of things I simply can't do with it. Very bad shutter lag, and writing to the CD just seems to take forever. I've got quite a collection of animal butt photos! And the 2.1MP resolution leaves a bit to be desired if I want to blow anything up to 8x10 or larger, but it does take great photos.

I'm giving serious thought to getting a Nikon D-70. I used to be a very serious amature photographer, and I've still got my Olympus OM-2 film camera, although I haven't used it in years. But having a DSLR with interchangable lenses would be very nice.

Now, all I need is for Santa to be really nice to me this year! lol

Mark


9 posted on 12/21/2004 5:57:42 AM PST by MarkL (Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But it rocks absolutely, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

Ive found that I take dozens of pictures of the same thing so I can pick and choose what I want later. It's also pretty handy when I know someone looking for a used car. I can send them pictures and info on cars and they can decide if they want to take the time to check them out.


10 posted on 12/21/2004 5:59:18 AM PST by cripplecreek (I come swinging the olive branch of peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I do hope to got to a 5 mega pixel sometime soon.

Actually, the price of five megapixel cameras have become really cheap lately. You can often get the Canon PowerShot A95, the Casio EXILIM EX-Z50, and the Konica Minolta DiMAGE X50 for well under US$400 at online retailers.

11 posted on 12/21/2004 5:59:27 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
I've got quite a collection of animal butt photos!

Caused by the shutter lag or just a personal choice of photo selection? Not that there's anything wrong with that.

12 posted on 12/21/2004 6:01:36 AM PST by KarlInOhio (In a just world, Arafat would have died at the end of a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

I am going to get one and need to check out the benefits of several brands and models. Why did you choose that Fuji model?


13 posted on 12/21/2004 6:01:39 AM PST by doug from upland (Vietnam Vets: FINALLY -- welcome home, heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

The Kodak Easyshare system just won a JD Power award. I'm very un-techie and I can download the pictures using the dock you can get. We bought the Kodak DX7590 which comes with the dock. We like it a lot. I was resisting going digital until our vacation pictures from Mt Rushmore didn't turn out.


14 posted on 12/21/2004 6:02:51 AM PST by Trust but Verify (Their candidate uses rock stars to attract crowds. Ours IS a rock star!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Might try that. I have a HP 750 PCS. Ink is expensive. $30 a cartridge. It takes two, color and black.

You definitely should. I've never seen a home-printed picture that looks as good as a photo lab print. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that other stores offer the same service as WalMart (submit online, pick-up in one hour at local store) but they're the one that I use. Very convenient if you need/want the prints right away. The pricing is less if you have the prints delivered (takes about a week). We also used them for our photo greeting cards this year; online submission made it a breeze!

15 posted on 12/21/2004 6:03:28 AM PST by whd23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
But having a DSLR with interchangable lenses would be very nice.

But alas, digital SLR's are still exorbitantly expensive. You might want to look something like the Canon PowerShot Pro 1 or the Nikon CoolPix 8800 instead for now.

16 posted on 12/21/2004 6:03:57 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
Actually, the price of five megapixel cameras have become really cheap lately.

I just got a 5Mp Kodak Easyshare though Walmart which included a docking station and rechargable batteries. Price:$199.

17 posted on 12/21/2004 6:05:55 AM PST by LTCJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
I just hope all our dig pics are still accessible in 100 years.

As if you're going to be around in 100 years to look at them?

18 posted on 12/21/2004 6:07:14 AM PST by scooter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

It has 6X optical zoom, 4.0 mega pixels, view finder, and monitor (I'm a view finder guy), and as much memory as you want to buy. I compared it with other's and I liked it more. I believe it's made by Olypus.


19 posted on 12/21/2004 6:07:21 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Boycott Boycotts Warrior. If you aint buying call me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Nice pics! I bought an Olympus. 5 megapixals.







This pic will be on the cover of the Dallas Chamber of Commerce road map for Winter 2005...


20 posted on 12/21/2004 6:07:41 AM PST by Dallas59 ("A weak peace is worse than war" - Tacitcus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson