HOLLYWOOD EXPOSES CLINTON'S SUPPORT OF AFRICAN GENOCIDE

Newsmax ^ | 12/20/04

[dead]

Do you have a link to that?

Here’s the links:

A Holocaust We Could Have Stopped

The Triumph of Evil

An added bonus about those two articles is that they are from The Village Voice, so you won’t have to hear about your “nutty rightwing sources” when you send a liberal the links.

[mewzilla]

Gee, I wonder why all this info wasn't being reported at the time.

[areafiftyone]

Thanks soooo much!

[areafiftyone]

Fear of the death squad (the Clintons)

[Caged in Canuckistan]

"It would have been an unusually bold move for a big, expensive studio production like 'Black Hawk Down' to blame President Bill Clinton and American public opinion for setting the stage for the kind of terrorism behind Sept. 11."

I certainly have never heard of any widely released movies that explicitly blamed a certain administration for anything...do you?

[processing please hold]

Sorry.

roll = role.

[areafiftyone]

Sure I did - Farenheit 9/11 - blamed Bush for everthing and then some.

[processing please hold]

Thanks.

I don't know how I missed that on the History Channel. One of the few worth watching anymore.

[Caged in Canuckistan]

There was a LITTLE sarcasm there...

[Republicus2001]

does anyone recall from what country Kookie Anon originally came from?

[Republicus2001]

she crapped out

[processing please hold]

My only reply is, I'm stunned into silence.

[Egregious Philbin]

Everything i've seen or read about the genocide in Rwanda describes an almost unspeakably horrific massacre.

I do not think that it is fitting to speak of the tragedy only as the result of a failure of Bill Clinton. I do not wish to let him off the hook - he still has not accepted his share of the blame for not intervening, and I doubt he ever will. The author of this piece only seems to see "Hotel Rwanda" as an occassion to point the finger at Clinton and the UN, and not a larger group of people, including every one of us. We should all ask ourselves what we thought about Rwanda at the time. Quite simply, I didn't.

[processing please hold]

And that Bit** has the gall to critize W?

[shield]

This was in line with the NWO's long term agenda...clintoon was just one of their stooges caring out that agenda.

Thank God....President Bush is one of the Cowboys. They are all stopping the NWO's agenda dead in it's tracks. ;o) (And they're all mad as hell about it...all you have to do is listen to their MSM to know it.)

[libs_kma]

When the speakers were condemning something that took place during a Republican administration, they always said "Bush" and "Reagan." But if it was during a Democrat's administration, it was always just "The United States."

Ah yes, a cute trick indeed. Hitlery did this all the time too. If she was speaking about something that bubba did that couldn't reflect poorly on her, he was "my husband". If it was one of the many embarassments, he was "the President".

They think nobody notices.

[dead]

There’s something wrong in those links. I think the “quotemarks” in the html are funky, or it might just be my browser. Here they are again:

http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/9908/hentoff.php

http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/9909/hentoff.php

[Riverman94610]

Maybe Clinton SHOULD have intervened in Rwanda but that raises a much bigger issue-do we intervene ANYWHERE in the Third World that is experiencing tribal warfare?Why not also go into Sierra Leone,the Congo,Liberia,Sudan,Angola and anywhere else where what happened in Rwanda was going on as well,albiet on a smaller scale.
Sooner or later it is AFRICANS that are going to have to solve African problems.Calling on the white man to bail them out of their terrible situation is embarassing and paternalistic.

[peacebaby]

No Balls Bill, exposed again

[mewzilla]

Well, the Toons can continue to kiss their legacy goodbye. I can't wait 'til someone gets around to Oil For Food.