Posted on 12/20/2004 5:41:51 AM PST by bmweezer
Our friends at CBS News are at it again -- suggesting that blogs, bloggers, and everything related to non-mainstream media reporting is at the root cause of the troubles in the industry. Not the almost unconscionably poor job that the CBS News research division has been doing in vetting stories for accuracy, nor the obvious left-leaning bias of most of its broadcasters…but blogs.
Haven’t these people heard the warnings from one of the organizations that they hold in such high esteem -- the Occupational Safety and Health Administration -- regarding the tossing of inanimate missiles from the confines of one’s transparent residential structure? I guess not.
Well, in case you missed our last episode, retired CBS News stegosaurus Eric Engberg in November reemerged from the Jurassic Period to suggest to the unwitting populace that bloggers were responsible for the premature predictions of exit polls on Election Day. To catch a rerun of the pilot, please see CBS Blasts The Blogs. Now, with enough time having passed so that most of the nation has composed itself, another CBS News correspondent obviously working his way towards an early extinction, David Paul Kuhn, has this to say about all things not MSM:
Internet blogs are providing a new and unregulated medium for politically motivated attacks. With the same First Amendment protections as newspapers, blogs are increasingly gaining influence. While many are must-reads for political junkies, are some Internet blogs also being used as proxies for campaigns?
You gotta love it. The highest profile member of the organization that this man works for just resigned in a cloud of shame over allegations that he reported information apparently coming from forged documents, and within weeks, the same outlet is pointing fingers at volunteer writers across the nation who mostly share their thoughts with the public out of a passion to do so. This is akin to exiting a restroom with toilet paper stuck to the bottom of your shoe, and then standing on top of a desk in your office so that everybody can see. Frankly, I’m half expecting Emily Latella to at any moment look up at the camera and whisper innocently, “Never mind!”
And, what pray tell, is truly bothering Mr. Kuhn and his employer about the blogs this time? Well, hold on to your seats, for it appears that a couple of bloggers in South Dakota who were pro-John Thune took money from his campaign…$35,000 BETWEEN THEM, to be exact. Oh, the HUMANITY!!! Of course, Mr. Kuhn conveniently neglects to inform the reader that Jon Lauck of Daschle v Thune, a university professor, and Jason Van Beek of South Dakota Politics, a university student, were hired by the Thune campaign well after establishing these blogs. Or that the $35,000 given to them for such nefarious and clandestine activities as analyzing polling data represented 0.0875% of the $40 million the two candidates spent on this campaign. The horror.
Speaking of missing the forest for the trees, I haven’t been able to find any articles written by Mr. Kuhn wherein he expresses a commensurate level of shock and dismay concerning the fund raising and distribution activities of the group MoveOn.org, or the possibility that it was a “[proxy] for campaigns.” I guess Mr. Kuhn hasn’t heard of them, or that the very day after his article came out concerning these bloggers receiving shameful sums of money in the tens of thousands of dollars, MoveOn.org announced with pride that it contributed as much as $300 million to Kerry and other Democratic candidates in 2004 -- potentially including Tom Daschle.
Actually, I just made a Kuhn pas. Of course he’s heard of MoveOn.org. He’s even written about them. Quite glowingly, in fact. Here’s one of Mr. Kuhn’s masterstrokes from September 8, 2004:
A newly formed organization will soon begin airing ads stating that President Bush “dodged his own military duty during Vietnam.” Called Texans for Truth, the group has ties to the liberal organization MoveOn.org.
In addition, Mr. Kuhn had previously written an article referencing this fabulous organization on June 29, 2004 while gushing with exultations about Hollywood’s favorite left-wing propagandist:
Michael Moore has a war plan to defeat President Bush. With MoveOn.org, he now has his army.
The excruciatingly delicious irony here is that Mr. Kuhn obviously had much less of an ethical problem with Mr. Moore and MoveOn.org’s plan that involved hundreds of millions of dollars and the potential for countless campaign finance violations than the completely legal payment of $35,000 by the Thune campaign to these bloggers -- that is, until the plan failed of course.
Regardless, our heroes from South Dakota have been receiving some well-deserved accolades for their fine efforts -- although I imagine that defeating Mr. Daschle was what they are truly thankful for…as are we all. Whichever the case, John Fund did a story about these two gentlemen in a recent Wall Street Journal column:
South Dakota Republicans decided that the Sioux Falls Argus Leader, which dominates the state's media since it's the only paper with a statewide circulation, was hopelessly biased in favor of Mr. Daschle. "The ability to use the Internet to circumvent concentrated media power became a 21st-century updating of 19th-century Dakota populism," says John Lauck, a history professor at the University of South Dakota who was allied with Mr. Thune. Mr. Lauck and several of his friends collaborated on blogs that constantly reminded voters of contradictions between Mr. Daschle's voting record and his statements in South Dakota, as well as the Argus Leader's refusal to acknowledge them.
Thankfully, it appears that the efforts of our heroes quite paid off.
The paper's readers also began to take notice of the range of coverage available on the blogs that mysteriously didn't show up in their local paper. "The Argus Leader often doesn't present the whole picture in its political coverage," Wendy Otheim, a teacher from Hartford, S.D., wrote the paper in October. "A multitude of blog sites make for interesting reading. Don't be held a captive audience to the Argus Leader."
Excellent advice, Mrs. Otheim -- advice that it appears many South Dakotans took. As for Mr. Kuhn’s contentions about our heroes, Mr. Van Beek addresses them best at his blog:
I began my blog a year before Thune declared his candidacy. I became a consultant for Thune in July of 2004, a year and six months AFTER I began blogging. From the beginning, I have always been very clear about my political predilections. I consistently told readers of my blog that I was pro-Thune. If my blog was a "proxy" for the Thune campaign then it can fairly be said that the Argus Leader and CBS have been proxies for Democratic campaigns since time immemorial. The difference is that I tell everyone I am not an objective observer. To this day, the Argus Leader and CBS hold themselves out as objective observers. I think blogs in general have pretty much exploded that notion. Yet the "mainstream media" continue to splutter about "dirty tricks" and "ethics" and make a nauseating show of wrapping themselves in virtue.
Hear, hear. However, this doesn’t answer the most important question stemming from this charade: Why is CBS News still fighting this battle? To be sure, they can’t be pleased about the outing of Dan Rather’s forged documents in “Memogate.” Moreover, it quite appears that the efforts of our heroes ended up assisting in ousting Tom Daschle from his cushy post as the left’s chief legislative obstructionist. Putting these two incidents together, along with the hostile response, one must conclude that the media chieftains have taken a look into the future, and they don’t like what they see.
The Internet has been a scary invention as far as the Democrats are concerned as a result of Matt Drudge breaking the Monica Lewinsky story, and many of them have been calling for stricter regulations over this medium ever since. Now, with bloggers outing Dan Rather and Memogate, as well as aiding in the defeat of the Democratic Senate Minority Leader who was quite an ally to the media, the MSM is also crying for legislative restrictions.
In a glorious holiday example of life imitating art, it appears that Mr. Potter is once again concerned about The Bailey Building and Loan threatening his business. Isn’t life wonderful?
Noel Sheppard is an economic and geopolitical analyst and writer residing in Northern California. Noel receives e-mail at slep@danvillebc.com.
Or to use blogger terminonology,
CBS=pwned!, MSM is teh sux
Blogs are.... "unregulated?" Oh the horror!
Absolutely. Everything that is posted here is subject to peer review by tens of thousands of knowledgeable Freepers.
I don't say "knowledgeable" as a toss-away compliment. I've noticed that, no matter what the topic... law, politics, physics, music, education... we have a full staff of qualified experts. People with staggering educations and years of experience, ready to confirm or debunk any claim.
The MSM should hope for such.
Very very often, the Old Media FRAUDcasters are more like two months behind the 'net with stories, not two days.
Each and every week for since the Lewinsky Blue Dress story, I have discussed with some friend or colleague items that they had not heard of, and items which would not hit the old news outlets for over a month. A real good example is the Oil-For-Food mess, which was reported by the Wall Street Journal and FR almost two years before the rest of the world started to pay attention at all. It is by no means the only example though, and those who pay attention to a third of the stories on FR will always be a week ahead of the FRAUDcasters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.