In regards your statement ...
"If Marcavage has a history of defending a molester of boys"
Can you point me to any proof that Brother Stephen was charged and found guilty of "molestation" of any boy or boys (plural) as you implied?!?
That's a conditional. It has an "if"... and he was not convicted of molestation, but solicitation, right? Is that your point? Sorry...let me clarify.
As I recall, the accusation he was convicted on was that he tried to lure a 14-year-old boy into his van for oral sex...for $20.
In fact, it was more than just one charge, right?
Is that better?