"Nonetheless, your failure to discover such discussions is hardly support for your insulting claim that evolutionists "are completely obsessed with their flesh"."
Cry me a river.
"6. A form of "self" which allegedly persists after death of the body. "
Talk about insulting claim "allegedly persists".
Matthew 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear HIM Which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
Cry me a river.
Hey, if you're not bothered by your non sequiturs, neither am I.
["6. A form of "self" which allegedly persists after death of the body. "]
Talk about insulting claim "allegedly persists".
Why exactly do you find this insulting? And that was in no way a "claim", it was part of a question.
And are you going to answer the question, or are you going to evade it so that you can have a cheap excuse to later claim that no one has still addressed your issue that I'm trying to address for you?
You wrote, "I have yet to read one offering by an self identified E describing the E's theory of the soul." I'm trying to do exactly that, but in order to answer the question you've actually asked, instead of some similar but different question, you need to clarify more precisely what you have in mind when you say "soul".
Now would you care to do that, or are you just going to play games and get offended about my word choice?