[grey_whiskers]

If interpretation of Scripture flies in the face of the physical evidence, Scripture must be reinterpreted in light of that evidence.

Not necessarily.

[Opening yet another can of worms...]

Miracles by definition 'fly in the face of evidence';
but they claim ab initio as it were, to be exceptions, directly resultant from extra-natural activity.

If miracles are claimed to be "how things normally work", or (sometimes) when something with an everyday explanation, of which the viewer is ignorant, is asserted to be a miracle, then the red flags should go up.

[Junior]

True. However, the situation we are talking about is covered by lots of evidence that it occurred naturally and is not the result of a one-off miracle.