Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Counter for a day finds few bugs in recount process
The Seattle Times ^ | 18 December 2004 | Danny Westneat

Posted on 12/18/2004 2:19:24 AM PST by JosefK

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
FYI...

Of course, you have my blog at
1 posted on 12/18/2004 2:19:24 AM PST by JosefK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JosefK

http://josef-a-k.blogspot.com


2 posted on 12/18/2004 2:19:40 AM PST by JosefK (If you have tips on election theft attempts - please call 425.646.7202 (Rossi HQ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49; CyberCowboy777

Consider yourselves pinged...


3 posted on 12/18/2004 2:32:29 AM PST by JosefK (If you have tips on election theft attempts - please call 425.646.7202 (Rossi HQ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: matchgirl

I forgot you - sorry :-(.


4 posted on 12/18/2004 2:33:12 AM PST by JosefK (If you have tips on election theft attempts - please call 425.646.7202 (Rossi HQ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
"I would put people counting over machine counting any time."

If you were one of those who caught six Rossi votes being placed in a Gregoire stack, you wouldn't. And that sort of thing happened, at more than one table.

The media has been assigned a job here, folks.

5 posted on 12/18/2004 2:37:52 AM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (I actually voted for John Kerry...before I voted against him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet

Well, they're embeds...

Go figure. Also note the comments of Rossi's nanny. That has got to crimp Marummy and the troops. She should have very respectfully kept her mouth shut because it looks like the backdoor message of Dino Rossi...

That said, you may want to note the involvement of the Teamsters... Geese, mandatory union contribution - UGH!


6 posted on 12/18/2004 2:40:49 AM PST by JosefK (If you have tips on election theft attempts - please call 425.646.7202 (Rossi HQ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JosefK

Dr. Deming's red bead experiment shows that 100% quality checks put in more error than systematic quality controls.

In other words, the manual count is less accurate than the first count and each succeeding handling of the ballots will result in a larger error. This is what the Rats want to happen. They don't care what the people want.


7 posted on 12/18/2004 2:54:17 AM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JosefK

Blog update for this morning at http://josef-a-k.blogspot.com is up...

Go on down to "Marummy Watch" if you want the Rossi camp statement...


8 posted on 12/18/2004 2:58:35 AM PST by JosefK (If you have tips on election theft attempts - please call 425.646.7202 (Rossi HQ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; JosephK; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; Steve_Seattle; Cacique; ...
First all, if the count done by these machines is inaccurate, it's because of the incompetence of the people who programed them, not the because of an inherent flaw in the machines themselves.

Contrary to what this columnist may believe, it's not possible for these Teamster goons to be more "reliable" than their electronic counterparts. If anything, both methods of tabulating votes are equally suspect in their reliability/accuracy.

Secondly, I don't think that humans are necessarily more trustworthy than machines.

In fact, in some cases, I think that they're less able to get things done right. There are undoubtedly Rhesus monkeys that exhibit more intelligence than certain Democratic electors.

PEOPLE ARE STUPID!

That aging, Pali-loving hippie profiled in this piece is just one illustration of the truth of the above statement.

Finally, what makes this mediocre hack believe that the people supervising the re-vote currently taking place in King County didn't put on a show, specifically, for him and his cohorts in the left wing press?

9 posted on 12/18/2004 3:07:11 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham (Why did it take me so long to come up with a new tag-line, huh?! What's up with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JosefK

Anyone knows hand counts are never as accurate as machine counts. In my line of work, this is a fact.


10 posted on 12/18/2004 3:07:26 AM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

Line of work being?


11 posted on 12/18/2004 3:15:32 AM PST by JosefK (If you have tips on election theft attempts - please call 425.646.7202 (Rossi HQ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

Maybe you are - you spelled my name with a ph.

That said, you failed to note that the Palestinian radical nutcase was balanced by the Rossi family nanny...


12 posted on 12/18/2004 3:16:57 AM PST by JosefK (If you have tips on election theft attempts - please call 425.646.7202 (Rossi HQ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JosefK
What do you mean by that?

I have no idea what your name is.

13 posted on 12/18/2004 3:28:07 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham (Why did it take me so long to come up with a new tag-line, huh?! What's up with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JosefK

Considering Hand vs Machine must not be judged based on the fact that perhaps MOST of the hand counters, even in King County, are honest Americans - both Dem and Pub. The issue as I see it is that in a hand count, the counters that are working against the system can do ALOT more damage to the process than a machine. The [rotton] human can read the news, use the phone, call the hacks, etc... and know the quantity of votes required and then, based on that persons job, do all he or she can to cheat.


14 posted on 12/18/2004 4:25:06 AM PST by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JosefK
That said, you failed to note that the Palestinian radical nutcase was balanced by the Rossi family nanny...

Well, you were almost right.

Republican appointee: McClellan, 21, a recent University of Washington grad who applied to be the Rossi family nanny and got this job because her brother-in-law works for the campaign.

15 posted on 12/18/2004 4:34:50 AM PST by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
"I would put people counting over machine counting any time."

If you were one of those who caught six Rossi votes being placed in a Gregoire stack, you wouldn't. And that sort of thing happened, at more than one table.

I'm reminded of a story my wife's grandmother told....

Grandma worked for the county in a small Nevada town. The elections ballots were the fill-in-the-dot type (apparently similar to Washington state's ballots) and optically scanned. Grandma tells the story of one election where an election worker concealed a pencil lead under his fingernail and scratched a line through his candidate's bubble on ballots that went for the opposing candidate. The scanner would then reject the ballot as a double vote.

16 posted on 12/18/2004 5:08:36 AM PST by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shubi
Dr. Deming's red bead experiment shows that 100% quality checks put in more error than systematic quality controls. Hey, thanks for bringing back memories! In his low voice, "There's no way to know!". He was a great guy! Was at one of his seminars in Cali yrs ago. Learned alot! BTW, I wish democrats would accept nothing is perfect & learn to accept that only thing consistant is change.
17 posted on 12/18/2004 6:03:15 AM PST by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

Since you can't read whom you're replying to - it's JOSE-F AS IN JOSEF!


18 posted on 12/18/2004 6:28:43 AM PST by JosefK (If you have tips on election theft attempts - please call 425.646.7202 (Rossi HQ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Guess so. Woops. Just sounded about right...


19 posted on 12/18/2004 6:29:05 AM PST by JosefK (If you have tips on election theft attempts - please call 425.646.7202 (Rossi HQ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SIRTRIS
BTW, I wish democrats would accept nothing is perfect & learn to accept that only thing consistant is change.

They do "accept" it . . . when their candidate is leading. They just don't accept it when they get whupped.

For example . . . just imagine how loud they would've screamed had Thune challenged the Indian votes when he ran against Johnson. When a Pubbie does it, it's either racism or whining. When a Democrap does it, it's "making sure every vote counts" . . . again, so long as the decision is made in their favor.

They don't want fair elections . . . they know they would just join the T-Rex that much sooner.

20 posted on 12/18/2004 6:32:03 AM PST by geedee (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson