If you were one of those who caught six Rossi votes being placed in a Gregoire stack, you wouldn't. And that sort of thing happened, at more than one table.
The media has been assigned a job here, folks.
Dr. Deming's red bead experiment shows that 100% quality checks put in more error than systematic quality controls.
In other words, the manual count is less accurate than the first count and each succeeding handling of the ballots will result in a larger error. This is what the Rats want to happen. They don't care what the people want.
Blog update for this morning at http://josef-a-k.blogspot.com is up...
Go on down to "Marummy Watch" if you want the Rossi camp statement...
Anyone knows hand counts are never as accurate as machine counts. In my line of work, this is a fact.
Considering Hand vs Machine must not be judged based on the fact that perhaps MOST of the hand counters, even in King County, are honest Americans - both Dem and Pub. The issue as I see it is that in a hand count, the counters that are working against the system can do ALOT more damage to the process than a machine. The [rotton] human can read the news, use the phone, call the hacks, etc... and know the quantity of votes required and then, based on that persons job, do all he or she can to cheat.
What is a "no-see-um"?
What is this crap?
God, I hate unions.