Bingo!
Nahh, just create 'all-female' combat platoons, companies, battalions, divisions, etc.
That way, no male will lose his life to the inability of women to do the job. At the same time, the women will push their co-workers to achieve the male standards because THEY will know that if the standard isn't met, there will be no man to save them.
Women in the military have had lower standards and an easy ride knowing that a man would pick up the slack. Putting the women into an 'all-female' unit will ensure that they will pull their own weight, as there will be no one to do it but themselves.
And if the 'all-female' combat units suffer large numbers of casualties... Well, the feminists won't be able to complain, as they got what they wanted. As for the rest of America, I think that they'd be very upset to learn that the casualties were caused by liberal feminist policy.
There would be happy liberals and American voters angry at the same happy liberals, which would equal more Republicans voted into office.
Which would lead to less women in the military.
Altogether, that would be a win-win situation.
:-)
More likely, an adjustment of standards downward, to accomodate the gals along with informal quotas for the officer corps. It has already been army policy to maintain a floor for gals going in to the Engineer and Aviation branches.