Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What does this say about the character of this man?
1 posted on 12/17/2004 5:12:07 PM PST by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: everyone

I fail to see any excuse for this.

But, better late than never.


2 posted on 12/17/2004 5:19:17 PM PST by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

Well, I think he should go to each funeral. After all, the man's got nothing better to do. Seriously, we could bog him down in the sad facts of death and take him away from the pursuit of victory. Ultimately, we'll lose more lives that way, but at least it won't look bad.


3 posted on 12/17/2004 5:19:17 PM PST by elhombrelibre (Liberalism is proof that intelligent people can ignore as much as the ignorant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
"What does this say about the character of this man?"

As always, Rummy is a life long bureaucrat with a heart.

Aside from Dubya, Rummy is my favorite person in this administration.

4 posted on 12/17/2004 5:26:46 PM PST by Tarpaulin (Look it up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

Pride goeth before the fall.


5 posted on 12/17/2004 5:28:57 PM PST by PubliusEXMachina (Ashely's Story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
Good old dope smoking hackworth shows up again.

As tom Lantos said at least Admrial bota (sp) killed himself.

Hackworth is a perfumed prince who figure Ike was a great combat leader and it was cool to smoke dope with the troops, and then the going got tough he ran away to australia.

8 posted on 12/17/2004 5:36:06 PM PST by dts32041 (When did the Democratic party stop being the political arm of the KKK?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
Hackworth said he objected to using the stamped signatures for promotion and commendation letters as well, but said not personally handling the condolence letters is a much more serious offense.

During the Second World War it was the unit commander who wrote the condolence letters. During the Korean, Cold, and Vietnam wars it was the same. Donald Rumsfeld is a kind and gracious man who decided to send these letters himself. He didn't have to do it.

Hackworth, despite his many medals, is not qualified to wipe Donald Rumsfeld's ass. Hackworth should go back to pushing pictures of Prisoner Abuse to the New York Times.

11 posted on 12/17/2004 5:37:20 PM PST by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
Illinois resident Bette Sullivan, whose son John was killed in November 2003 while working as an Army mechanic in Iraq, was incensed when she, her son’s wife and her grandchildren received the exact same condolence letter with the apparently stamped signature

Wonder if she knows about Osama Obama's book deal and whether she will say anything about that.

BTW all you think Rumsfeld is a lousy SECDEF, I give you two words Cohen and Aspin.

13 posted on 12/17/2004 5:39:26 PM PST by dts32041 (When did the Democratic party stop being the political arm of the KKK?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

Bush needs toi come out FORCEFULLY and say Runy is his man and staying on and that all these partisan won't matter

And he needs to TELL the GOP congress to GET WITH THE DAMN PROGRAM and the hell with McCain


19 posted on 12/17/2004 5:48:38 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

Everyone loves to kick a dog when he's down. If Bush is behind him, I certainly hope there's a good reason and I trust that there is. If not...loyalty is important but our soldiers lives are so much more important.


20 posted on 12/17/2004 5:49:38 PM PST by ozarkgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

How long did it take FDR to sign the letters of the 19,000 Americans killed in the Battle of the Bulge in 1944? Had he yet finished signing letters for those killed at Pearl Harbor, Guadacanal, Bataan, Slapton Sands, Omaha Beach, etc., etc.?


34 posted on 12/17/2004 6:39:10 PM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
Looks like just more Rummy Phobia to me.

And is it just me or is the way the press is reporting this makes it sound like this (auto-signed) letter is the ONLY thing these families of the fallen get?

Isn't it still policy to notify the families in person?

44 posted on 12/19/2004 1:36:10 PM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
I'm not sure it says anything definite about the character of Rumsfeld, but what it does, is make stark the fact that some order war, and others have to actually fight and die in them. And this is an instance of making the one who orders war look inferior to the man who actually fights the war.

And there's no finessing (sp?) this, he could have signed those letters himself, it doesn't amount to a big expenditure of time.

I think Rumsfeld is being truthful when he says he just wanted to get the letters out to the families ASAP, but that's an explanation worth nothing. A delay of a couple of days here or there is meaningless.

That being said, there's probably many instances of tacky expediency in every war, ever fought, since the beginnning of time.

50 posted on 12/19/2004 1:54:44 PM PST by AlbionGirl (Pray for the American Catholic Church. Pray that the Lord send us holy, dynamic, warrior-like men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
Rumsfeld to sign death letters

Yeah, leave it to CNN for heartless headline of the day......

51 posted on 12/19/2004 1:56:32 PM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
What does this say about the character of this man?

You're piling on Rumsfeld too?

This is the most ridiculous thing to get incensed over I've seen yet.

73 posted on 12/19/2004 5:56:30 PM PST by sinkspur ("How dare you presume to tell God what He cannot do" God Himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
What does this say about the character of this man?

Not a damn thing. Rumsfeld is the best SECDEF this country has ever had. Period.

75 posted on 12/19/2004 6:04:48 PM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
What does this say about the character of this man?

Nothing. The Secretaries of Defense, or War, have not traditionally written these letters. It's been the duty of the unit commander to do so, since he was there and had personal knowledge of said event. Rummy was doing more than customary, and now he's being roasted for it. Ironically, had he done less, there would be no call for complaint.

77 posted on 12/19/2004 6:16:50 PM PST by Steel Wolf (Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules. Mark it zero, Dude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
What does this say about the character of this man?

I believe that Rumsfeld is a brilliant intellect, with the kind of old fashion character rarely seen nowadays. He is the mastermind behind the entire operation, if he goes off course it would not be good for our effort.
I am concerned about the pounding his psyche would take by
having to sign letters everyday. Now I just saw on TV were some dimwit politician wants Rumsfeld to personally call every family that has lost a loved one in Iraq.
It seems to me that this is an effort to mentally breakdown a gallant and honorable man. Can you see, they are trying to use his own strength against him.
This is not to belittle the loss of a loved one in combat.
115 posted on 12/20/2004 7:30:32 AM PST by oldbrowser (You lost the election.....................Get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
But several families of troops killed overseas said they were sure the notes they received had not been signed by hand, and said they were angry that Rumsfeld was not paying attention to their loss.

Good lord! There was a time when the best a family could hope for was a telegram from the War (later Defense) Dept. It is entirely possible to be deeply supportive of and sympathetic to the families of our troops (and those who lost loved ones on 9/11, and the shuttle, and the hurricanes, etc., etc., etc.), and yet to also be darned sick and tired of just how whiny our society has become.

130 posted on 12/20/2004 10:02:12 AM PST by Wolfstar (Where are you, Miss Beazley?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

“I have directed that in the future I sign each letter,” he said in the statement.

But why would he agree to suddenly sign letters if - as some here have suggested - there was nothing wrong with him NOT doing it?


131 posted on 12/20/2004 10:05:39 AM PST by JCBurton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

Doubia's lining up Wolfowitz for the top job. If you thought the entrenched bureaucracy hates Rumsfeld, wait till the Wolf comes in. I personally would like to see Richard Pearl in the top job.


137 posted on 12/20/2004 10:16:30 AM PST by bubman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson