Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TERMINATTOR
Its a well written and researched piece of work - however, even these guys left open the door for some level of restrictions, hence the following:

"Our analysis is limited to determining whether the Amendment secures an individual, collective, or quasi-collective right. We do not consider the substance of that right, including its contours or the nature or type of governmental interests that would justify restrictions on its exercise, and nothing in this memorandum is intended to address or call into question the constitutionality, under the Second Amendment, of any particular limitations on owning, carrying, or using firearms."

The analysis of the last four words - shall not be infringed - are conspicuous by their absence. The last four words have not been addressed by any court over the last 100 years, including the excellent analysis done in the 5th Circuit Emerson case. These last words are the most powerful in the entire Bill of Rights; they suppose (and impose) the heavy burden of proof upon the government to show cause why anyone's RKBA should be restricted.

19 posted on 12/17/2004 5:24:46 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 45Auto
The analysis of the last four words - shall not be infringed - are conspicuous by their absence

You gotta admit, it would have been somewhat awkward to have the Justice department acknowledging "shall not be infringed" means "shall not be infringed" at the same time the President was saying he would sign a bill extending the most significant federal infringement since the 1930s (other than the 1986 FOPA's last minute ban on newly manufactured machine guns for civilians perhaps)

24 posted on 12/17/2004 5:34:35 PM PST by El Gato (Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto
These last words are the most powerful in the entire Bill of Rights;
they suppose (and impose) the heavy burden of proof upon the government
to show cause why anyone's RKBA should be restricted.

They ARE the most powerful and they DENY the government
the ability to show cause why anyone's RKBA should be restricted.


2 entries found for infringed.
in·fringe    ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (n-frnj)
v. in·fringed, in·fring·ing, in·fring·es 
v. tr.
To transgress or exceed the limits of; violate: infringe a contract; infringe a patent. 
Obsolete. To defeat; invalidate. 

v. intr.
To encroach on someone or something; engage in trespassing: an increased workload that infringed on his personal life. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Latin nfringere, to destroy  : in-, intensive pref.; see in-2 + frangere, to break; see bhreg- in Indo-European Roots.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
in·fringer n. 

[Download or Buy Now]
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 


Main Entry: in·fringe
Pronunciation: in-'frinj
Function: verb
Inflected Forms: in·fringed; in·fring·ing
Etymology: Medieval Latin infringere, from Latin, to break, crush, from in- in + frangere to break
transitive verb : to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another ; 

33 posted on 12/17/2004 5:51:57 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto

"These last words are the most powerful in the entire Bill of Rights; they suppose (and impose) the heavy burden of proof upon the government to show cause why anyone's RKBA should be restricted."

Exactly. Imagine if you had to register and pay a fee to exercise your 1st Ammendment rights.


94 posted on 12/17/2004 8:57:02 PM PST by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: 45Auto

Well, if nutcases, serial killers, and foreign agents present in the US have the 'uninfringeable right' to own weapons, then that causes a problem.

The resolution is likely in language which defines "citizen" of the US.


114 posted on 12/18/2004 7:41:31 AM PST by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson