Skip to comments.
Palestinian Genes Show Arab, Jewish, European and Black-African Ancestry
Global Politician ^
| December 16, 2004
| David Storobin, Esq.
Posted on 12/17/2004 3:05:57 PM PST by quidnunc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
1
posted on
12/17/2004 3:05:58 PM PST
by
quidnunc
To: quidnunc
What, no Palistinian genes? /shock
2
posted on
12/17/2004 3:07:04 PM PST
by
konaice
To: quidnunc
Well, this should piss off the Muslims.
3
posted on
12/17/2004 3:08:50 PM PST
by
MisterRepublican
("I must go. I must be elusive.")
To: quidnunc
This was like being a devoted Nazi trying to join the SS but when they researched your family roots they found some "non-Aryan" blood.
To: quidnunc
"Yemenite Arabs have 35% Black African genes"
Like Osama.
5
posted on
12/17/2004 3:11:00 PM PST
by
Max Combined
(Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist")
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: quidnunc
Middle east is the crossroads of culture. Why is this news?
7
posted on
12/17/2004 3:12:58 PM PST
by
cyborg
(http://www.zimbabwesituation.com/flamelily.html)
To: GSlob
8
posted on
12/17/2004 3:14:07 PM PST
by
cyborg
(http://www.zimbabwesituation.com/flamelily.html)
To: MisterRepublican
My Palestinian friend (Christian) tells me that most Muslims have some Jewish blood, just as most Americans have American Indian blood somewhere in their backgrounds.
OK, quibble withh the "most," but you know what she means: It's common.
9
posted on
12/17/2004 3:15:07 PM PST
by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
To: Max Combined
Just please tell me that Yasser had extraterrestrial genes...no human or animal deserves to be related to that blood.
10
posted on
12/17/2004 3:18:06 PM PST
by
weenie
(Islam is as "dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog." -- Churchill)
To: quidnunc
Duh. People scr3w around. Wake me up when you have news.
11
posted on
12/17/2004 3:18:36 PM PST
by
Tax-chick
(Jesus is the reason for the season which begins at sundown on December 24.)
To: Tax-chick
12
posted on
12/17/2004 3:21:45 PM PST
by
cyborg
(http://www.zimbabwesituation.com/flamelily.html)
To: Veto!
Most Americans have American Indian blood in them from somewhere? I think you just tossed off the word "Most".
The actual percentage, although I'd have to check the books, is almost certainly much, much lower than "Most", which implies a majority. Kind of a silly statement.
Although I'd be proud to have Indian blood, my mother-in-law (85) won't even talk about it (I'm doing her genealogy on behalf of my kids); generational differences are interesting, I'll tell ya.
13
posted on
12/17/2004 3:25:02 PM PST
by
Nabber
To: quidnunc
Well... I'm very proud to say that I am 90% Martian.
It's the other part that worries me... 10% FreeRepublic !!! ;-))
14
posted on
12/17/2004 3:30:17 PM PST
by
GeekDejure
( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!!)
To: quidnunc
I read somewhere that the Boers (South Africa) have about 10% "non-European" genetic material. Its not hard to figure out where that material came from, given where they have lived for the past 400 years. Just goes to show that nuts raving racial purity, be they Hitler or Calipso Luoie, are nuts.
15
posted on
12/17/2004 3:31:26 PM PST
by
Pilsner
To: cyborg
"Middle east is the crossroads of culture. Why is this news?" Crossroads of humanity.
16
posted on
12/17/2004 3:33:48 PM PST
by
blam
To: Nabber
I'd bet that most Americans descended from folks who were here before say 1820 have some Indian blood. On the frontier, be it upstate New York, Kentucky, or the Transvaal, European women were scarce. (And yes I'm, part Cherokee)
17
posted on
12/17/2004 3:34:57 PM PST
by
Pilsner
To: Nabber
almost certainly much, much lower than "Most", LOL. I KNEW someone would quibble. For families that settled the Wild West, I think "most" might be reasonably accurate, however.
As for older Americans being touchy about Indian blood, ain't it a shame? Makes it so hard to trace ancestry. My grandfather looked like the fellow on the flip side of the buffalo nickel, but no Indian heritage was reported. The family even lived near the Cherokee Nation, but no one owns up. Now family geneaologists are tearing their hair. We can trace one line back to 1650, but this other trail seems to end at 1875.
Good luck with your search ! Or should I say, "Happy Trails?"
18
posted on
12/17/2004 3:36:42 PM PST
by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
To: quidnunc
Palestinian Genes Show Arab, Jewish, European and Black-African Ancestry
No kidding. That part of the Middle East, especially where modern Israel is today, has been for millennia one of the most intensely immigrated (this use doesn't sound right) areas on the face of the planet. It's no wonder that the so-called Palestinians should be a genetic flotsam and jetsam.
19
posted on
12/17/2004 3:39:16 PM PST
by
aruanan
To: blam
thanks for helping the caffeine addled :-)
20
posted on
12/17/2004 3:39:34 PM PST
by
cyborg
(http://www.zimbabwesituation.com/flamelily.html)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson