Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

W.House Gives Rumsfeld New Vote of Confidence
Yahoo!News ^ | December 17, 2004 | Steve Holland

Posted on 12/17/2004 1:17:57 PM PST by Kaslin

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The White House gave a new vote of confidence on Friday to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld amid growing criticism of him from members of President Bush (news - web sites)'s own Republican Party.

"Secretary Rumsfeld is doing a great job leading our efforts at the Department of Defense (news - web sites) to win the war on terrorism and to help bring about a free and peaceful Iraq (news - web sites), and the president is focused on working closely with him on those matters," said White House spokesman Scott McClellan.

Rumsfeld has faced heavy criticism for not sending more troops to Iraq and failing to give them proper equipment. In recent days some prominent Republicans have questioned his performance.

Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott said in his home state of Mississippi on Wednesday: "I am not a fan of Secretary Rumsfeld. I don't think he listens to his uniformed officers."

Lott did not call for Rumsfeld's resignation but said, "I would like to see a change in that slot in the next year or so."

Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record), a strong Bush supporter on the campaign trail this year despite past differences, got the latest round of criticism under way by saying he had no confidence in Rumsfeld.

Then a prominent moderate Republican, Sen. Susan Collins (news, bio, voting record) of Maine, was critical of the Pentagon (news - web sites) for insufficient armor protection for troops in Iraq.

Rumsfeld got himself into trouble last week by appearing to brush off a soldier headed to Iraq who complained that military vehicles did not have sufficient armor and troops were having to piece together scraps of metal for extra protection.

"As you know, you go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time," Rumsfeld had told the soldier in Kuwait.

Little more than two weeks ago, Bush told Rumsfeld that he could stay on as defense secretary in the president's second term.

The thinking behind the decision was not to change leaders while the United States is at war, even though many in Washington blame Rumsfeld for failing to recognize and prepare for a determined Iraqi insurgency. More than 1,000 Americans have died in combat in Iraq.

McClellan said Rumsfeld was responding to troop concerns.

"Secretary Rumsfeld cares deeply about our men and women in uniform, and I think that is reflected by the way he goes and visits directly with those who serve, particularly those in combat zones, and he listens to those concerns, and that's what the president expects," McClellan said.

The Bush administration is preparing an emergency supplemental budget request for early in the new year that could seek as much as $75 billion to $100 billion for funding the U.S. military in Iraq.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armorflap; bush43; praise; rumsfeld; trentlottisafool
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 12/17/2004 1:17:57 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Great!!! He needs to counter this vicious assault. The Republicans at times (in the senate and congress) don't seem to realize they won.


2 posted on 12/17/2004 1:22:25 PM PST by commonguymd (the commonguy's corner bar blogspot - http://commonguyva.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Glad to hear this! McCain, Biden, Hagel, Lott and Collins need to remember who is the President of the United States and remember their roles as Senators. Bunch of mealy-mouthed media whores!


3 posted on 12/17/2004 1:24:25 PM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

And just think, were it not for the dummycrats, Lott would be the GOP Senate Leader. Sure makes you want to write a check to the GOP, doesn't it?


4 posted on 12/17/2004 1:26:45 PM PST by Huck (I only type LOL when I'm really LOL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

A shot across the bow of the big mouths, next comes a broadside if they don't heave to !!!!


5 posted on 12/17/2004 1:27:29 PM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Nothing tells you that you are doing a good job more than having Trent Lott in opposition.

Will he ever pry his lips off of the DNC Donkey's backside?

6 posted on 12/17/2004 1:27:48 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Why can't you be like Endicott?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
And just think, were it not for the dummycrats, Lott would be the GOP Senate Leader.

Lott was driven out of the Leadership by race pimps, and by gutless Republicans who would not stand up to them.

Bill Frist has done exactly nothing in his two years in the job, so I don't see how Lott could have done any worse.

That said, Lott is trashing Rumsfeld because the shipbuilders in Pascagoula see the handwriting on the wall.

7 posted on 12/17/2004 1:31:34 PM PST by sinkspur ("How dare you presume to tell God what He cannot do" God Himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Would those "gutless Republicans" include the President?


8 posted on 12/17/2004 1:35:11 PM PST by notigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Bill Frist has done exactly nothing in his two years in the job, so I don't see how Lott could have done any worse.

Well, Frist did tell Specter to shove it and toe the line...

9 posted on 12/17/2004 1:37:40 PM PST by frog_jerk_2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

http://www.neoperspectives.com/rumsfeld.htm

Rumsfeld Quotes for the Rumsfeld fans.


10 posted on 12/17/2004 1:46:37 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/terrorism.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notigar
Would those "gutless Republicans" include the President?

Yes. Not one of Bush's finer moments.

11 posted on 12/17/2004 1:53:45 PM PST by sinkspur ("How dare you presume to tell God what He cannot do" God Himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: frog_jerk_2004
Well, Frist did tell Specter to shove it and toe the line...

Did he? We'll see if it works any better than his "threats" to Democrats over judicial nominees. Those worked well, didn't they?

12 posted on 12/17/2004 1:54:52 PM PST by sinkspur ("How dare you presume to tell God what He cannot do" God Himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Rumsfeld got himself into trouble last week by appearing to brush off a soldier headed to Iraq who complained that military vehicles did not have sufficient armor and troops were having to piece together scraps of metal for extra protection.

This is an out an out lie. They left out about 2 minutes of his response and focused on his finishing sentence.

Counting up the Rino's jumping on the bandwagon makes the Republicans majority in the Senate only a simple one 51 to 49.

13 posted on 12/17/2004 1:59:04 PM PST by rocksblues (RINO's = McCain, Lott, Collins, Hagel Coleman ! developing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Bill Frist has done exactly nothing in his two years in the job, so I don't see how Lott could have done any worse.

I don't care if Cicero had been the Majority Leader; fact is, we only have nominal control of the Senate at the moment. 51 Senators, plus Zell, less the Maine gals and Chafee leaves us short of a majority. Come January 3, though, we'll have enough Senators that we won't have to rely on dubious allies like the aforementioned New England Senators.

14 posted on 12/17/2004 2:00:38 PM PST by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Did he? We'll see if it works any better than his "threats" to Democrats over judicial nominees. Those worked well, didn't they?

Damn Sink, did you foreclose on TLB's keys to malcontency on FR, and have taken up the/his cause.

Anyway, whatever, it is never pretty when some weak kneed Senate Republicans cower in fear towards the NYT/Wash Post editorial morons.

15 posted on 12/17/2004 2:03:19 PM PST by Dane (Trial lawyers are the tapeworms to wealth creating society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Lott is upset because Rumsfeld didn't support more ship building in Miss.


16 posted on 12/17/2004 2:04:49 PM PST by G Larry (Time to update my "Support John Thune!" tagline. Thanks to all who did!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues
Exactly right. Good commentary piece on the media's intentional rewording and attack here:

Ugly Reporting Wrongs Rumsfeld (Fog of Journalism)

17 posted on 12/17/2004 2:05:32 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"...amid growing criticism of him from members of President Bush's own Republican Party."

I'm sorry, but Collins, McCain, and Lott are NOT members of Bush's own Republican Party.

They're RINOs at best.

18 posted on 12/17/2004 2:09:10 PM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Damn Sink, did you foreclose on TLB's keys to malcontency on FR, and have taken up the/his cause.

I didn't like the way Lott was treated by fellow Republicans over the Strom Thurmond remarks. They were made just to make the old boy feel good, not due to any racism on Lott's part.

Republicans ran for the tall grass, rather than standing up to the race pimps, with Bush leading the way.

I have no particular love for Trent Lott, especially now that he's attacking Rumsfeld. I just thought hounding him from his leadership role was an excuse by Republicans to get rid of someone they saw as ineffective, so they could put someone else in (Frist) who has proven just as ineffective.

19 posted on 12/17/2004 2:09:13 PM PST by sinkspur ("How dare you presume to tell God what He cannot do" God Himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues
This is an out an out lie. They left out about 2 minutes of his response and focused on his finishing sentence.

Of course it's a outright lie, but you didn't expect anything different from Rooters did you?

20 posted on 12/17/2004 2:10:09 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson