To: placebo11
But it'll still be something bad about him, and there will be some reference to Hitler. He'll be Man of the Year because he was the most divisive, intrusive, invasive, radical, uncompromising, yadda yadda yadda.
Dan
8 posted on
12/17/2004 9:20:22 AM PST by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
Should be Kerry, Loser of the Year.
14 posted on
12/17/2004 9:23:45 AM PST by
SIRTRIS
To: BibChr
Agree...they want GOP dollars to read that issue as they slam GW........not gonna buy it !
Time telling GW he's the man of the year has zero worth or honor. Screw that pile of presstitutes ......
106 posted on
12/17/2004 6:18:21 PM PST by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: BibChr
But it'll still be something bad about him, and there will be some reference to Hitler. He'll be Man of the Year because he was the most divisive, intrusive, invasive, radical, uncompromising, yadda yadda yadda. This is probably the first and only time that I have agreed with you.
112 posted on
12/17/2004 9:15:22 PM PST by
Netizen
To: BibChr
http://www.time.com/time/personoftheyear/archive/stories/
But it'll still be something bad about him, and there will be some reference to Hitler
Oddly enough Hitler was time man of the year in 1938. So was Stalin in 1939 and 1942.
123 posted on
12/18/2004 10:19:36 AM PST by
bad company
(Just cause you're paranoid doesn't mean someone's not out to get you.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson