Skip to comments.
New Climate Thriller: Scary, but Is It Science?
NY Times ^
| December 14, 2004
| ANDREW C. REVKIN
Posted on 12/16/2004 7:22:32 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
On of the Times' science reporters attempts to do a book review that doesn't address any of Crichton's criticisms of global warming, greenhouse gas theory, and environmentalists.
1
posted on
12/16/2004 7:22:32 PM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
I just ordered this book yesterday, and it should be here fairly soon. Hopefully, it's as good as I think it will be.
2
posted on
12/16/2004 7:24:20 PM PST
by
exnavychick
(Just my two cents, as usual.)
To: neverdem
Of course not. Liberals always write bad reviews of books they hate. It never fails to hurt the book sales though.
3
posted on
12/16/2004 7:25:09 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: neverdem
---the renowned Dr. Hansen, while he has somewhat changed his views, was the creator of one of the first computer models to "simulate" global climate change.
His first model was only lacking a southern hemisphere, continents and water vapor in the atmosphere, IFRC---
To: neverdem
The editors of The New York Times think it's very cheeky of Michael Crichton to defy their official politically correct opinion. Now they'll have to think of a way to keep his latest book off their bestseller list.
Usually they can think of some rule why a book of which they disapprove doesn't qualify.
5
posted on
12/16/2004 7:28:02 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; ..
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
6
posted on
12/16/2004 7:29:21 PM PST
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: neverdem
If anyone claims to have a scientific model of global climate, ask the against which historic change it has been validated.
<<<<<<<< ........... crickets.......>>>>>>>>>>>
7
posted on
12/16/2004 7:34:05 PM PST
by
patton
(Changing culture is like moving a cemetary. You don't get much help from the residents.)
To: exnavychick
I just got the book yesterday - I am already half way through it. (I'd be finished but I have some clients that are VERY anxious to have their projects completed so they take off next week.) The book is very entertaining.
To: NHResident
Good. His usually are. :)
9
posted on
12/16/2004 7:38:44 PM PST
by
exnavychick
(Just my two cents, as usual.)
To: neverdem
Bah Humbug!! Now "The Day After Tomorrow". That is some REAL science.(NOT!!!)
10
posted on
12/16/2004 7:45:34 PM PST
by
DMZFrank
To: Cicero
I'm surprised that they did not ignore the book, or question Chricton's mental stability.
11
posted on
12/16/2004 7:50:32 PM PST
by
rmlew
(Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
To: neverdem
I hope Crichton makes a gazillion bucks off of this book, and Mel Gibson makes the movie.
Life is sweet.
12
posted on
12/16/2004 7:57:08 PM PST
by
keithtoo
(Defeat Le' Partie' Democratique)
To: neverdem
On the surface, Michael Crichton's "State of Fear," can be seen simply as a thriller in which environmentalists happen to be the villains. Say it ain't so!
13
posted on
12/16/2004 8:27:28 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
To: neverdem
"As a novel it looks way too didactic, but as an anti-global-warming alarmism, anti-Malthusian diatribe it is going to drive the forces of darkness into a rage," Mr. Ebell said. I don't do drugs anymore. Could someone who does please tell me what this means?
14
posted on
12/16/2004 8:29:26 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
To: neverdem
Oh, wait. That Ebell guy is a good guy. I take that back. I feel like such a DUmmie.
Dang. And that was a good zinger. Gotta save it for future use.
15
posted on
12/16/2004 8:31:19 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
To: Texas Eagle
I don't do drugs anymore. Could someone who does please tell me what this means?
It means it'll be a boring read, but it will pi$$ off the left.
16
posted on
12/16/2004 8:32:25 PM PST
by
beezdotcom
(I'm usually either right or wrong...)
To: neverdem
Another fun book
\
Fallen Angels Larry Niven
Takes a good swipe at Greenies
17
posted on
12/16/2004 9:08:21 PM PST
by
ASOC
(Land of the Free, owing to the Brave)
To: neverdem; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
18
posted on
12/16/2004 10:35:30 PM PST
by
farmfriend
( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
To: neverdem
Environmentalists as villains? Whatever could give someone THAT idea? :-)
To: farmfriend
20
posted on
12/17/2004 3:03:57 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson