Maybe. Personally I agree. I tend to stay away from blatantly quoting legal that I have no background knowledge in when the DU fancy speaking trolls are around. They seem to have taken classes in filibustering. And if you can't properly express yourself, they twist the point.
I see a few known ones here on this thread now.
So if 'accessory to a crime' is the correct law, then yes.
Personally, I'm an ignoramus, it sounded like a possibility to me.
But according to natural law, we both know the truth about responsibility.
He's as guilty as sin.
And it is rather surprising the number of Kinsey/Christian arresting apologists on this thread. With very reasoned tones of course. Just being reasonable, oh yes.