Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Klein turns up the heat in same-sex controversy
Globe and Mail (Toronto) ^ | 2004-12-16 | Katherine Harding

Posted on 12/16/2004 5:06:34 AM PST by Clive

Edmonton -- Alberta Premier Ralph Klein is emerging as the leading figure in the national battle against same-sex marriage, saying yesterday that he is disappointed with federal Conservative Leader Stephen Harper's efforts to marshal opposition.

Mr. Klein, who has called same-sex marriage "morally wrong," also may soon hit the road on a cross-country tour to shore up public discontent over the issue.

"I wouldn't go now because it's too close to the holidays, but we'll see what happens after the holidays," the Progressive Conservative Premier told reporters yesterday. "I'll see what the mood is."

In the meantime, Mr. Klein is asking Canadians to write to their federal politicians to urge them to "defend the traditional definition of marriage."

Alberta is the only province that has openly objected to the federal Liberals' plans to legalize same-sex marriage in legislation to be introduced as early as next month.

Mr. Klein's comments are the latest in a string of public pronouncements on the matter. Besides suggesting a national referendum on the issue, he has said that if same-sex legislation is passed he will urge federal politicians to demand that the government invoke the notwithstanding clause to stop it.

"I don't know where Stephen Harper is," he said when asked what the federal Opposition Leader was doing to block same-sex marriages. "I can't direct Mr. Harper to do anything, but it would be much more comforting to me and my caucus if he would say that they were going to propose amendments to allow same-sex unions only or to [support using] the notwithstanding clause.

"I don't know if he is going to do that."

Mr. Harper has proposed that the government legislation be amended to entrench the traditional definition of marriage. But has refused to say whether he supports the idea of using the Constitution's notwithstanding clause to prevent the legalization of same-sex marriage.

The clause is a mechanism that the provincial and federal governments can use to override the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which provincial courts have cited in decisions upholding the right of gay couples to marry.

Earlier this week, deputy Conservative leader Peter MacKay accused Mr. Klein of being "anything but helpful" on the controversial issue.

Mr. Klein's 61-member Conservative Party caucus unanimously voted yesterday to pursue all political options at its disposal, including launching the national letter-writing campaign. In recent days, several members of his party have floated potential legal options. They include a plan for the province to stop issuing marriage licences and instead register unions between all couples, as well as a push for a constitutional amendment to protect traditional marriage.

However, Mr. Klein said after his party's closed-door, three-hour meeting that those ideas have all been "put aside" until the federal government's proposed same-sex legislation is tabled.

Even though Mr. Klein is a "political heavyweight," John Wright, senior vice-president of polling firm Ipsos-Reid, said it's unlikely his lobbying effort will change many minds on same-sex marriage.

"There is a mood in the air for accepting equality rights and I think then that you have to cancel your own political position," he said. "It's not just about the now -- it's about the future." Same-sex couples may now legally marry in six provinces and one territory.

Mr. Wright said Mr. Klein's decision to take the national stage on this issue could damage the federal Conservatives' popularity. "This type of stuff continually paints them into a corner as being right-wing social conservatives, which is not where the votes are."

Nevertheless, Mr. Klein said he will "do whatever it takes" to stop federal same-sex legislation and he plans to write Prime Minister Paul Martin to allow a free vote on the matter so that politicians can "vote their conscience."

Currently, Liberal cabinet ministers are expected to toe the party line. However, two ministers, John Efford, Natural Resources Minister, and Joe Comuzzi, minister responsible for Northern Ontario economic development, have not yet said whether they will support the bill.

Mr. Efford made an announcement in Ottawa yesterday, but refused to say how he will vote.

"I am not going to make any comment today. I said in Newfoundland the other day I owed it to the church leaders of Newfoundland to talk to them first. The story has been taken, twisted around and it's not going to be twisted any more until I meet with the church leaders, and that will be next Tuesday."

Asked for his personal view on same-sex marriage, Mr. Efford said he had no comment and brushed past reporters. He did not say which church leaders he intends to meet.

His spokesman, Tom Ormsby, said Mr. Efford will make a public announcement immediately after their meeting next week.

With a report from Joe Friesen in Ottawa


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; perverts

1 posted on 12/16/2004 5:06:34 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; coteblanche; Ryle; albertabound; mitchbert; ...

-


2 posted on 12/16/2004 5:06:55 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

why don't all you gay people -- who are so adept at real-estate dealing -- go get yourself your own island in paradise and start your own nation? cause this one is never going to change for you.


3 posted on 12/16/2004 5:11:13 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (if a man lives long enough, he gets to see the same thing over and over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer


ping


4 posted on 12/16/2004 5:49:42 AM PST by DTA (proud pajamista)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clive

hy does the left whine about the mythical separation of church and state?

The whole idea of "separation of church and state" as a body of law comes from "Reynolds v. United States" where it was made clear by the court that marriage could be regulated by statute alone.

Advocates of homosexual marriage are seeking a ceremonious sanctification for their idolatries of perversion, they want an esoteric absolution to justify their guilt-ridden egos.

Logic works and you can make valid secular argument to support Mosaic Law. (This is why the Left attacks the Ten Commandments.)


5 posted on 12/16/2004 5:51:15 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Gotta love Alberta - an island of common sense in a sea of lunacy.


6 posted on 12/16/2004 5:54:01 AM PST by SolutionsOnly (but some people really NEED to be offended...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTA; little jeremiah

Thanks for the ping and pass it on ..


7 posted on 12/16/2004 7:12:42 AM PST by NYer ("Blessed be He who by His love has given life to all." - final prayer of St. Charbel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Excellent comments. More than a year ago when the Judge Moore and the 10 Commandments in Alabama were in the news, there were many active (and often heated) threads about the 10 Cs.

I actually wrote some lengthy arguments supporting that the 10 C's can easily be understood in a non-sectarian manner, that they are supportive of religion in general.

Blackstone said that they are the foundation of law.

"If men will not be governed by the Ten Commandments, they shall be governed by the ten thousand commandments." --G. K. Chesterton


8 posted on 12/16/2004 7:20:55 AM PST by little jeremiah (What would happen if everyone decided their own "right and wrong"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Confusing political twitching from Canada. Moral of the story - those who do not want to surrender to "gay" marriage are being advised it's not politically expedient to fight it.

I thought standing up for what's right is more important that "going with the flow". Suppose the "flow" is heading off into the abyss?

Let me know if anyone wants on/off thing pinglist.

Can Alberta secede?


9 posted on 12/16/2004 7:25:13 AM PST by little jeremiah (What would happen if everyone decided their own "right and wrong"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Why is Alberta the only sane area in this country? Is it the beef? The ranches? What!

All of us normal people can't all just move there. This is so depressing. This once great country is going down the toilet!


10 posted on 12/16/2004 7:47:56 AM PST by In The Crease (Canada---no leftists need apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Ping!

They'll even have their own form of population control... AIDS. Not to mention the fact the disease would quarantined!


11 posted on 12/16/2004 8:22:05 AM PST by odoso (Millions for charity, but not one penny for tribute!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: In The Crease

The cultral demographics up here are not much different than yours, we just do not have a south to balance things out. The liberal democratic Socialist movement is under fire up here as it is down thier and they have lost thier momentum thanks to President Bush and his courage. We are just a little behind the curve as per usual.


12 posted on 12/16/2004 9:26:52 AM PST by albertabound (It's good to beeeeee Albertabound.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: odoso

indeed. and a case study in darwinism that with no collateral damage.


13 posted on 12/16/2004 9:36:43 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (if a man lives long enough, he gets to see the same thing over and over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: albertabound

Albertabound: I live in Ontario and I'm sick of the way our country is going!


14 posted on 12/16/2004 11:26:48 AM PST by In The Crease (Canada---no leftists need apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
can Alberta secede?

In our dreams .......

Ryle in Alberta

15 posted on 12/16/2004 3:49:17 PM PST by Ryle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

If you understand that ALL pagan civilizations have resulted in dictatorship and violent ends, you can see why the neo-pagan left is so opposed to Mosaic Law.

Mosaic Law is where we get the idea human beings have INDIVIDUAL rights.

The progression of pagan Babylon, pagan Egypt, pagan Greece, pagan Rome, pagan National Socialism, pagan Soviet Socialism, Marxist iconic New Age neo-paganism and Islamic paganism brings us full circle back to Iraq (where that idolatrous Astrology nonsense started). The war on terror is about the Judaic sense of justice versus the forces of paganism (Malakhim Raoth).

It is no accident the left is so animated about Iraq and are in bed with the Islamic pagans who also hate the Jews and Messianic Judaism (Christendom)...


16 posted on 12/16/2004 8:07:18 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson